search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
21


used. Certain peaks were cryogenically focussed to increase signal intensity and directed to a HRMS for ultra sensitive analysis, without the potential risk of peak slicing incumbent with modulation.


Experimental


All experiments were carried out on a Thermo Scientific®


DFS™ High Resolution


GC-MS coupled to a Thermo Scientific Trace™ GCxGC unit equipped with a Thermo Scientific TriPlus™ auto-sampler. The GCxGC was equipped with a cryogenic GC


modulator device using liquid CO2 as a cryogen (Figure 2). A standard split/splitless injector was employed in splitless mode for all injections.


Time controlled CZC experiments were carried out using standard single GC columns; TR-Dioxin 5MS 30 m and 60 m, both I.D. 0.25 mm and 0.1 µm film (Thermo Scientific). The modulator was placed between 1 - 4 m from the MS end of the analytical column.


The cryogenic gas operation was timed controlled and fully integrated within the GC method control software, via time event settings (Figure 3). Only one of the two jets of the modulator was used for the experiments (Figure 2). Complete and fully automated timed CZC methods could be created and sequenced using the Xcalibur® data system.


Magnetic sector GC-HRMS is constrained by acquisition rate [10]. In order to achieve the fast sampling frequencies required for this type of analysis, only a reduced number of selected target masses can be used with magnetic sector GC-HRMS detection. Sampling cycle times of 80 – 100 ms were used corresponding to 10 – 12 Hz (Figure 4). Observed typical baseline GC peak widths with CZC activated were ca. 600-700 ms and 6 – 8 MS data points could be sampled over the peak with the settings and columns used.


HRMS settings were equivalent to standard settings typical in routine dioxin analysis: 45 eV, Resolution 10,000 (10 % valley definition), etc.


Certified standards from Wellington Laboratories, Ontario, Canada were employed. The DFS instrument performance specification standard (20 fg/µL 2378-TCDD; 5 pg/µL 2378- 13


C TCDD) was diluted down to 2


and 0.5 fg/µL for CZC sensitivity experiments. For multi target CZC experiments a certified 1/10 EPA 1613 CSL standard (Wellington) was employed together with a pooled human serum sample (Figure 6-9).


Figure 5c: Cryogenic jet off: step 2 – re-inject peak of interest on 2nd dimension column Figure 5a: Cryogenic jet off results in normal peak width for non-target analytes


Figure 5b: Cryogenic jet on: step 1 – cryo-traps whole 1st


dimension peak of interest


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60