Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
A Quality Control Circle Process to Reduce Blood Culture Contamination Rates
Yu-Zhong Yan PhD1,a, Huan-Zhang Yang BSc2,a, Jiang-Xia Zhao PhD1 and Rong Xia PhD3 1Department of Hospital, Shanghai Zhoupu Hospital, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, China, 2Department of Clinical Laboratory,
Shanghai Pudong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China and 3Department of Transfusion Medicine, Shanghai Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
To the Editor—Blood culture remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections. In most settings, only 5%– 13% of blood cultures are positive, and 20%–56% of those represent contaminants.1,2 Historically, blood culture contamina- tion rates in our university-affiliated hospital have been con- sistently greater than the international recommended rate of 3%.3 If early clinical decisions are based on the contaminants, patients may be subjected to needless risk, and subsequently, health boards can be subjected to additional and unnecessary costs.4 Therefore, we developed a quality control circle, following the plan–do–check–act (PDCA) process, with an interdisciplinary task force to reduce the blood culture contamination rate. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a quality control circle in reducing blood culture contamination in our hospital. A quality control circle group was established, and members
were selected from the microbiology department, clinical wards, the nursing department, the administrative department, and the infection control department. Quality control circle members analyzed the causes of blood culture contamination related to the following categories: personnel, machine, material, method, and environment. Countermeasures were followed. The process of blood culture collection was standardized, and the use of the sterile procedure was advocated. In each clinical department ward, a venipuncture box was provided to hold a variety of equipment for blood sample collection. A comprehensive and continuous training program was held on schedule, including on- the-job training, drop-in educational sessions, and hands-on educational sessions. Contaminated cases were reviewed and discussed to determine which operator and/or patient factors were present. A WeChat work group was set up for timely release of information and communication of questions and answers (Q&A). A group meeting of the quality control circle was held monthly, and the group discussed continuous improvement measures regarding blood culture contamination. A feedback mechanism was also established, and the report was summarized and released monthly on the WeChat group. As shown in Fig. 1, contamination rates of all the department
wards, the mean contamination rates, and true-positive culture rates of the hospital were considered. In the prestudy period, the contamination rates of the divisions were high and varied from 6.1% to 10.3%. In total, 2,712 blood cultures were sampled, and
Author for correspondence: Rong Xia, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Hua-
shan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China. E-mail:
xiarongcn@126.com. Jiang-xia Zhao PhD, Shanghai Zhoupu Hospital, Shanghai University of Medicine &
Health Sciences, Shanghai 201318, China. E-mail:
huhua021@126.com. a Authors of equal contribution.
Cite this article: Yan Y-Z, et al. (2019) A Quality Control Circle Process to Reduce
Blood Culture Contamination Rates. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2019, 40, 119–120. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.271
© 2018 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved. Acknowledgments.
Financial support. This study was funded by Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (No. 81470351), Foundation in the Fourth Round of the Shanghai Municipal Key Disciplines of Public Health on Transfusion Medi- cine (grant no. 15GWZK0501) and Outstanding Leaders Training Program of
190 contaminated blood culture bottles were identified, giving a mean contamination rate of 7.0%, which is approximately double that of the international recommended rate. The true- positive rate of blood culture was 9.3% (253 of 2,712) during this period. After launching the quality control circle program, the monthly mean contamination rates decreased. At the end of the study period, the mean contamination rate was 2.3% (69 of 3,060), and the true-positive rate was 10.2% (312 of 3,060). Analysis of the data per division (Fig. 1) revealed a statistically significant contamination reductions in blood culture con- tamination in all categories. The mean contamination rate during the study period was significantly lower than that during the prestudy period (7.0% vs 2.3%; χ2=75.72; P<.001), while the true-positive rates did not change significantly (9.3% vs 10.2%; χ2=1.22; P=.27). Several suggestions have been proposed for ways to reduce
119
blood culture contamination rates.5, 6 Recently, Zimmerman et al5 suggested the use of a departmental report card to monitor the blood culture contamination rate; however, in some divisions, Zimmerman et al did not achieve a significant reduction in blood culture contamination rate. In another study, Self et al6 developed a sterile process for blood culture collection. A reduction in blood culture contamination rate was found, but only the emergency department and the blood culture collection process were eval- uated. Some evidence also suggests that contaminants originate from patient skin flora and that up to 20% of skin floramay still be cultured on harvesting samples using sterile surgical techniques.3 Therefore, further work is needed to decrease blood culture con- tamination rates in more categories, and continuous improvement in the related processes is necessary. Here, the quality improvement project was a quality control circle. We selected effective counter- measures and achieved an encouraging result for reducing the blood culture contamination rates in this 6-month study. Blood culture contamination is a significant problem faced by
many hospitals. To effectively reduce blood culture contamina- tion and to maintain the effectiveness of the processes imple- mented, cooperation between multiple departments and standardized procedures are needed. The quality control circle is a comprehensive and scientific management model, and it has been successful in reducing the blood culture contamination rates. After a circular plan–do–check–act process, the quality control circle project only needed minor revision. A sustainable reduction in contamination rates was then achieved.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136
