search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
1020


Journal of Paleontology


were produced directly from the photographs in Adobe Illustrator CS2.


Methods.—The length and width dimensions of protaspid pro- tocranidia (N=15) and meraspid cranidia (N=6) were mea- sured from photographs by the optical image analyzer TpsDig2 (Rohlf, 2006). In several protaspid and meraspid specimens (N=15) preserved with the intergenal spines (or at least their bases), the transverse distance between these spines was mea- sured (intergenal spine separation sensu Webster, 2007). The measured parameters were plotted on a bivariate diagram using the PAST package (Hammer et al., 2001). Additional data for the analysis of protaspid and early


meraspid cranidial dimensions were collected from publications by Kautsky (1945), Zhang and Pratt (1999), and Dai and Zhang (2012). The protocranidial and cranidial width was used as a proxy of protaspid and meraspid sizes. The width or width ranges were taken directly from the text descriptions of the mentioned publications.


Repository and institutional abbreviations.—All figured speci- mens are numbered with the prefix Lund Original (LO) or Lund Reference (LR), and are housed at the Department of Geology, Lund University, Sweden.


Systematic paleontology


Morphological terminology used in the description generally follows Whittington and Kelly (1997), Palmer (1998, for the terminology of macropleural segments), and Hughes et al. (2006, for the terminology of the postcephalic part of the exoskeleton). Spines projecting from the postero-lateral corner of protaspid protocranidia (= posterior fixigenal spine of Palmer, 1962) or early meraspid cranidia (= intergenal spine) are here considered as homologous (cf., Størmer, 1942), and therefore in both cases are designated as intergenal spines. We follow the trilobite classification of Adrain (2011).


Superfamily Ellipsocephaloidea Matthew, 1887 Family Ellipsocephalidae Matthew, 1887


Remarks.—The concept of the family as presented by Jell and Adrain (2003) is followed here. The whole group, however, needs a comprehensive revision supplemented by parsimony analysis.


Genus Ellipsostrenua (Kautsky, 1945)


Type species.—Strenuella (Ellipsostrenua) gripi Kautsky, 1945 from the Grammajukku Formation (Cambrian Stage 4), Laisvall area, Lapland, northern Sweden.


Remarks.—Kautsky (1945) erected Ellipsostrenua as a subgenus of Strenuella Matthew, 1887 with Strenuella (Ellipsostrenua) gripiKautsky, 1945 as type species.Henningsmoen (1959) raised Ellipsostrenua to generic level, and this approach was later followed by other authors (e.g., Sdzuy, 1961; Rushton, 1966). Ahlberg and Bergström (1978) considered Ellipsostrenua to be a junior subjective synonym of Ellipsocephalus Zenker, 1833.


The type species of Ellipsostrenua differs, however, in several important respects from the type species of Ellipsocephalus, and Ellipsostrenua is here treated as a separate genus. The char- acters distinguishing Ellipsostrenua (Fig. 2) fromEllipsocephalus (cf., Šnajdr, 1958) include: (1) a tapering glabella without distinct anterolateral corners; (2) distinct genal spines; (3) pleurae terminating in sharp spines; and (4) a pygidium with narrow pleural regions, a wide, convex rhachis, and a pair of small spines.


Ellipsostrenua granulosa (Ahlberg, 1984) Figures 2, 4–7


1984 2009 2012 2015


Ellipsocephalus? granulosus Ahlberg, p. 356, fig. 6.


Ellipsocephalus? granulosus; Cederström et al., p. 495, text-fig. 5.


non 2009 Ellipsocephalus? granulosus; Cederström et al., p. 506, pl. 4, figs. 8–10.


Ellipsocephalus granulosus; Cederström et al., p. 167, fig. 15AC–AF.


Ornamentaspis? granulatus; Høyberget et al., p. 39.


Holotype.—An incomplete cranidium deposited in the type collections of the Geological Survey of Sweden, Uppsala, as SGU Type 3935 (Ahlberg, 1984, fig. 6A).


Diagnosis.—See Ahlberg (1984, p. 357).


Remarks.—Ellipsostrenua granulosa is similar to closely rela- ted species E. gripi and E. linnnarssoni (cf., Kautsky, 1945; Høyberget et al., 2015), but differs from them by: (1) strong


Figure 2. Reconstruction of the adult morphology of Ellipsostrenua granulosa (Ahlberg, 1984): (1) cranidium and librigenae; (2) thoracic tergite; (3) pygidium. Based on Ahlberg (1984). Surface sculpture omitted.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190