search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Sproat and Zhan—A new paleogeographically important rhynchonellide from the Tarim plate 92(6):1005–1017 1013


Figure 7. Internal structures of Altaethyrella tarimensis n. sp. from ATX-402. Distance from the ventral umbo indicated in mm for each section. Dorsal valve uppermost. In this specimen, the dental plates are apparently missing, but dental cavities have likely been infilled by secondary shell growth. Due to the preservational state of the shell, this is difficult to determine.


Some specimens of Altaethyrella tarimensis n. sp. are


similar to an atrypide from the study area to be described in a future study. The atrypides are much more abundant than Altaethyrella, and can usually be differentiated externally from Altaethyrella by their smaller size, lower dorsal convexity, and slightly more rounded outline. However, differentiating between small Altaethyrella and


atrypide shells can be difficult. Small shells of Altaethyrella are also less convex and do not have a clearly subpentagonal outline as in larger shells. The only reliable external feature to differentiate the genera at this stage is the number of ribs in the sulcus and fold —Altaethyrella generally has at least three ribs in the ventral sulcus and four ribs on the dorsal fold with a sharp boundary between the fold or sulcus and shell flanks on each side, while the


atrypides often have a much weaker fold and sulcus, with only a single rib in the sulcus and two ribs on the fold. Altaethyrella also tends to have sharp, angular ribs while the atrypides feature less-prominent rounded ribs. In small and/or poorly preserved material, these characters can be difficult to determine reliably. The differences in internal shell structures are immediately obvious, because the atrypides possess larger crura that diverge toward the anterior and two mediodorsally directed spiralia— rhychonellides do not have skeletal lophophore supports amen- able to preservation in the fossil record. One of the species previously classified as Rhynchotrema


in China mentioned in Zhan and Li (1998), R. pentagonia Fang (in Liu and Fang, 1990) also from the Hadabulaktag Formation in Xinjiang, is likely one of these atrypide forms. Figures show


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190