This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Bonini et al.—New toxodont from Jujuy Province, Argentina


late Miocene), Entre Ríos Province, northeast Argentina (Brunetto et al., 2013).


Other species.—Besides the type species, X. doellojuradoi, X. prominens, X. cristatus, X. major, and X. ambrosettii (see Fig. 1.1). See comments above on the taxonomic validity of X. smaltatus.


Generic diagnosis.—(after Pascual et al., 1966): Toxodontid with skull high and compressed, narrow palate and quite exca- vated. Highly compressed premolars, arranged in closed series; P1 crescent-shaped, with labial convexity, with a layer of labial and lingual enamel; P2 with a convex labial face. Upper molars with the anteroposterior diameter very oblique with respect to the direction of the jugal series; postero-lingual lobe shorter than Hemixotodon; M3 without lingual groove, and enamel almost reaching the postero-labial side. Lower molars with lingual enamel extended anteriorly and the anterolingual column short and prominent.


Xotodon maimarensis new species Figures 3.1–3.3, 4.1–4.3, Tables 1, 2


Holotype.—JUY-P 49: incomplete mandible with right hor- izontal ramus with all teeth, symphysis with all incisors, and a small fragment of the left ramus without teeth. Maimará Formation (late Miocene–early Pliocene), Jujuy Province, northwestern Argentina.


Diagnosis.—Lower incisors more procumbent than in X. cristatus, X. major, and X. prominens; symphysis long and narrow with slight divergence of its lateral borders; chin angle lower than in Xotodon major, X. cristatus, and Calchaquither- ium mixtum, rather different from Mixotoxodon larensis and Toxodon sp.; chin bulging at the level of p2–3, which continues anteriorly in a short labial keel more marked than in X. major; the bulge limits strong lateral concavities.


Occurrence.—Maimará Formation (late Miocene–early Pliocene), outcropping at the west of National Route 9 and Maimará town (23°37'27''S, 65°24'48''W), Quebrada de Mai- mará, Jujuy Province, Argentina. Note that the most fossilifer- ous levels at Quebrada de Maimará, where we recently collected the first vertebrates with precise stratigraphic provenance for this formation (Pujos et al., 2012; Candela et al., 2013; Abello et al., 2015), are located between the most basal tuffs of the section that outcrops west of Maimará town.


Description.—The mandible is high, with short diastemata anterior and posterior to the canine and p1. In lateral view (Figs. 3.1, 4.1) the incisors appear procumbent. The horizontal ramus is higher at the level of p4–m1 than posteriorly (Table 1), and its ventral margin is straight, without a ventral projection. The alveolar margin is slightly divergent with respect to the ventral margin from m3 to p2–3. At p3–4 level, the horizontal ramus is narrow and projects ventrolaterally in a little expanded edge. In occlusal view (Figs. 3.2, 4.2), the symphysis is completely fused, narrow and long, forming a well-developed


569


U-shaped channel, barely widening forward; the posterior end of the symphysis reaches the level of p3–4. In ventral view (Figs. 3.3, 4.3), both hemimandibles


converge at the level of the ventrolateral expansion, forming a bulging chin that continues ahead into a centered short keel (Fig. 3.3), which would correspond to the “keeled chin” sensu Madden (1990, 1997). From this level, the symphysis widens and becomes labially flattened. Concerning preserved dentition (Figs. 3, 4; Table 2), the


incisors are heteromorphic, as in the most advanced Toxodonti- dae (Bond et al., 2006). The i1 and i2 are small and triangular in cross section, labio-lingually compressed, with an enamel band covering the mesial and labial sides and a narrow lingual enamel band near the mesial corner. The i3 are tusk-like and deeply implanted. They are subtriangular, mesially wide and with distally directed apices, with a round vertex (Fig. 3.2). The lingual enamel band is larger than the labial one, covering approximately three quarters of the lingual side; the mesial side lacks enamel. The canine and the premolars are broken. The canine is


separated from i3 and p1 by a short diastema; it is oval in cross section and bears a narrow enamel band on its labial side. The p1 is laterally compressed and approximately similar in size to p2 and p3 (Table 2). The p2 is separated from p1 by a short diastema; the posterior portion of p2 is broken, and is flattened transversally. Enamel covers the labial and lingual sides, both of which are smoothly concave. The p3 is similar to p2, but it is not possible to ascertain whether it has an enamel band. The p4 is the largest of the premolar series (Table 2). It is antero- posteriorly elongated, with lingual and labial enamel, and bears a smooth fold on the labial side. The molars are euhypsodont (sensu Mones, 1982). Their


crowns, typical of advanced toxodontids (Bond et al., 2006), are long and narrow, with a wide and labially convex trigonid and a long talonid that constitutes more than half of the molar (Figs. 3.2–4.2). These teeth present some characteristics indicated by Pascual et al. (1966) for Xotodon, such as the lingual enamel extended anteriorly, the paraconid extended laterally and anteroposteriorly short, and m1–2 with a slight lingual convexity. In addition, they present four columns and two lingual sulci as in Dinotoxodon Mercerat, 1895 or Toxodon, but they differ from these genera in depth of the sulci, outline of the columns, and contact between them. The labial side is completely covered by enamel in m1–3 and exhibits a deep and wide fold, posterior to the level of the anterior lingual fold. In the m1–2 the meta-entoconid fold is deeper, closer, and


directed more obliquely forward than the ento-hypoconid fold. The lingual enamel starts at the level of the anterior fold and reaches the posterior end of the hypoconulid, which is slightly extended lingually. The postero-labial angle of these teeth is well marked. In m3, the talonid is longer than in m1–2, and the ectoloph


bears a smooth concavity opposite to the ento-hypoconid fold. The postero-labial angle is more open than in m1–2, as a regular convexity.


Etymology.—Named after Maimará, a small town located in Tilcara Department, Jujuy Province, Argentina; the name is an Omaguaca (native language) word meaning “falling star.”


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216