This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
516


Journal of Paleontology 91(3):512–547


Table 3. Complete taxonomic list of the chondrichthyes of Lago Bayano, including a summary of all relevant data for the subsequent analyses. References for common depth ranges and biogeographic affinity (i.e., Atlantic vs. Pacific) can be found in the Systematic Paleontology section, ecomorphotypes are based on Compagno (1990), and descriptions of dentition types can be found in Kent (1994). * indicates a new taxon for the fossil record of Panama. † indicates an extinct species.


Taxon


*Isurus oxyrinchus 70–500 100–500


†Carcharocles megalodon Alopias superciliousus


Centrophorus sp.


†Physogaleus contortus *†Physogaleus sp.


†Hemipristis serra †Galeocerdo aduncus Galeocerdo cuvier


Carcharhinus falciformis *Carcharhinus brevipinna *Carcharinus aff. C. macloti Carcharhinus obscurus


*Alopias cf. A. vulpinus 51–366 *cf. Iago sp. Mustelus sp.


60 3


1


36 16 61 2


147 10


15 19 14 4


Carcharhinus plumbeus 820–55 Carcharhinus spp.


Negaprion brevirostris 30–92 Rhizoprionodon spp. Sphyrna lewini


184 405 66


Sphyrna mokarran 41–80 96 1 2


13


Sphyrna zygaena Rhynchobatus sp. Urobatis sp. *Dasyatis sp. Aetobatus sp. Rhinoptera sp.


Mobula thurstoni


*Mobula cf. M. tarapacana Mobula spp.


140


38 16 10


19 6


0–100 0–30


1422


Table 4. Results of the weighted paleobathymetric analysis. Min and max values represent 95% confidence intervals. Previous estimates are based on Pimiento et al. (2013a) for the Gatun and Carrillo-Briceño et al. (2015a) for the Piña Sandstone facies of the Chagres Formation.


Average depth (m)


Formation


Chucunaque Gatun


Maximum depth (m)


Chagres (Piña Sandstone) 293 458 372 509 804 654 200–300 50 61 55 98 118 108 <100


were unable to be assigned to the species level and those that are extinctwere not included in this analysis in order to reduce potential bias. The data were then resampled 10,000 times and plotted as a histogram that provides a 95% confidence interval and a mean depth. This method was applied to the chondrichthyan fauna from the Chucunaque Formation, the Gatun Formation, and the Piña Sandstone facies of the Chagres Formation. The average and maximum depth estimates are reported in Figure 14 and Table 4. The average depth is the average of the usual depth range and the maximum depth is the upper limit of the usual depth range of each taxon. All data utilized for these analyses are available in Table 3.


Institutional abbreviations and repositories.—The specimens described here are conserved in the Vertebrate Paleontology Collection of the Florida Museumof Natural History (FLMNH), University of Florida (UF). Specimen information can be found


in the FLMNH Vertebrate Paleontology Database (http://www. flmnh.ufl.edu/vertpaleo-search/) or in the Smithsonian Tropical


Min Max Mean Min Max Mean Estimates (m) 105 119 112 208 236 222


Previous


Research Institute (STRI) Geological Sample Database (http:// biogeodb.stri.si.edu/jaramillo/fossildb).


Systematic paleontology Class Chondrichthyes Huxley, 1880


Subclass Elasmobranchii Bonaparte, 1838 Order Squaliformes Goodrich, 1909 Family Centrophoridae Bleeker, 1859


Genus Centrophorus Müller and Henle, 1837


Type.—Centrophorus granulosus Müller and Henle, 1837 (Cappetta, 2012).


Centrophorus sp. Figure 3.1, 3.2


Occurrence.—STRI 290109.


Description.—Small, asymmetric tooth with a broad crown and an apron indicative of the order Squaliformes. However, it is worth noting that the apron is not characteristic of all families within the order Squaliformes, as it is absent in the upper teeth of Dalatiidae, Oxynotidae, and Etmopteridae. The mesial edge is convex basally and straight apically, has coarse serrations near the base that become smaller apically and disappear prior to the apex; the distal edge is slightly convex with a complete cutting edge. There is a prominent notch on the distal edge; however, the distal heel is not entirely preserved. The labial face is


50 15


0–140


200–500 0–100 0–170 0–400


0–275 0–200


# of Specimens Common Depth (m) Avg. Depth (m) Ecomorphotype 200–600


400 250


300 184


Microceanic Littoral: Archipelagic 70


350 50 85


46


138 40


100


200 38


Littoral: Cancritrophic Littoral: Cancritrophic Littoral: Eurytrophic Littoral: Eurytrophic Littoral: Eurytrophic Littoral: Eurytrophic Littoral: Teuthitrophic Macroceanic Littoral Littoral


Littoral: Eurytrophic Littoral Littoral Littoral


Littoral: Teuthitrophic Semilittoral: Sphyrnid Littoral: Sphyrnid Littoral: Sphyrnid Rhyncobenthic Rajobenthic Rajobenthic Aquilopelagic Aquilopelagic Aquilopelagic Aquilopelagic Aquilopelagic


Macroceanic: Tachypelagic Grasping-Cutting Both Macroceanic Macroceanic


Cutting Cutting


Cutting


Clutching Crushing


Cutting-Grasping Cutting-Grasping


Cutting-Grasping Cutting Cutting


Both


Cutting-Grasping Both Cutting-Grasping Both Cutting-Grasping Pacific Cutting-Grasping Both Cutting-Grasping Both Cutting-Grasping


Cutting-Grasping Both Clutching


Cutting-Grasping Both Crushing Crushing Crushing Crushing Crushing Vestigial Vestigial Vestigial


Both


Both Both


Cutting-Grasping Both Cutting


Dentition Type Atlantic/Pacific Cutting


Both Both


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216