search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Order! Order!


Figure 2: Atomic lattices: a) TEM image of a gold nanoparticle; b) AFM image of the surface of graphite; (c) TEM image of a grain boundary in gold foil.


“grain size” is usually done by super- imposing a circular grid and count- ing intersections with the boundaries, which measures the surface area of grain boundaries per unit volume [2]. Tis method is useful for an equilib- rium grain structure, but depending on heat treatment and mechanical deformation a duplex arrangement of different populations of grains may develop, in which case the “grain size” number can be misleading. Rolling the metal to a thin sheet (Figure 4b) or drawing it into a wire squeezes the grains into a distorted shape with


many more dislocations, which tangle and increase the hard- ness but decrease the ductility. Counting the number of inter- sections of a grid of lines with the boundaries as a function of direction is a commonly used method of assessing the degree of elongation and anisotropy. Some macroscopic man-made objects show uniform regular-


ity. A brick wall (Figure 5a) or hexagonal bathroom tile floor have minor variations that do not attract much attention. A parquet floor (Figure 5b) uses different wood grains and orientations that create more interest, and the elaborate tiling in the Alhambra (Fig- ure 5c) are regular and periodic but with enough variations and symmetries to engage the viewer. Even large man-made structures oſten exhibit regularity and symmetry along with complexity and unique design elements. Many cities have a regular array of streets (sometimes with unimaginative names like 42nd Street and 6th Avenue), which is convenient but not interesting. One way to measure the tendency toward regular or self-


Figure 3: Measuring atomic spacings using a selected area diffraction pattern (d-spacing • radius = constant).


Many common materials, especially metals, are produced


with controlled microstructures that seek to optimize the grain structure and dislocation density to provide the desired mechanical properties. Figure 4a shows the grain structure of a metal as it appears when polished and etched to reveal the grain boundaries. Generally the smaller and more uniform the grains the better the strength and ductility. Measuring the


avoiding spacing and its opposite, clustering, is to measure the neighbor distances. For a random distribution, such as a view of stars in the night sky (in spite of the human desire to impose order in the form of imagined constellations), the mean nearest neighbor distance is just 0.5•(Area/Number)1/2


. As illustrated


in Figure 6, a self-avoiding arrangement has a greater mean neighbor distance, giving a ratio to the value for random spac- ing greater than 1, while a clustered one has a smaller ratio value. Fourier transforms (or diffraction spots) may also be useful if the intensity profile of the peaks can be measured to represent the variations in spacing.


Partial Order A marching column of soldiers is


expected to show a perfect order with regular spacing, but in nature things are less perfect (Figure 7). Still, in a flock of birds or school of fish there is a degree of regularity that becomes apparent upon careful examination. Rather than a global regularity, each individual seeks to maintain the same approximate dis- tances from nearby neighbors as they move in coordination. Te characterization of partial


Figure 4: Metal grain structures: (a) equiaxed; (b) elongated by cold-rolling. 2020 March • www.microscopy-today.com


order is important in many materials that are examined microscopically.


13


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76