search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
In concept, designing a comparative test seems simple enough, but questions like this one must be dealt with. Enter Wallace Judd (President of Authentic Testing Corporation) who had, a number of years earlier, administered identical tests on word processing and spreadsheet software tasks for the same test-takers on the same day. “We were astounded with those results.” He recounts.


“People were not scoring identically in the morning on the same test with the same types of tasks that they had in the afternoon. So I think that will always be a limitation, that’s not going to go away. It’s just that you want to come as close as you can to the accuracy of predicting what some of these capabilities are and I certainly recognize those limitations.” In short, designing a carefully controlled study


requires a great deal of work and consideration. Tere is much more extensive background on the evolution of this testing and the design of the most recent wave of testing covered in this report available in the NCCCO Foundation’s publication.


AND THE RESULTS Here’s how Judd described the result: “Te primary conclusion was that with this simulator, you could make a decision about whether or not somebody was a competent Crane operator. Te classification accuracy on the actual crane was 87%. Te decision consistency in the virtual simulator was 94%. So we were actually able to predict with greater accuracy what people would do on the crane with the virtual system than with an actual Crane!” He does note that with more data, that differential may or may not persist, and the published study is based on a carefully structured analysis of 52 test candidates. But he concludes that, with the simulator, “…we can predict with very high accuracy whether somebody will be able to pass a test on an actual crane”. Te final recommendation of the published paper,


Judd later adds, is that were this to be implemented in the future, “…it’s recommended that only if people get a certain very high score on the simulator would they be granted a certification. if they didn’t pass at a certain level then they might be allowed to retest on an actual Crane and only if they failed dramatically on the virtual reality test would we recommend that they take additional practice before testing on either.”


BENEFITS OF THE SIMULATOR EVALUATION Several benefits of the simulator environment are revealed in the course of this discussion. Judd notes that, “you


ITI’s booth at CONEXPO-CON/ AGG in 2017


can do things that you would be afraid to do… on the actual site.” Te ability to simulate complex or extreme operations in a no-risk environment is analogous to flight training for pilots. Judd adds, “Yeah, if you if you want to practice stalls, you want to practice them in a virtual system not in a real, multimillion-dollar plane.” And of course, cost. ITI’s Zack Parnell notes that,


“…in Houston, Texas right now a lattice boom crane exam costs a thousand dollars, …and to be able to lower that price to a to basically a CBT type exam for 50 bucks is a pretty big savings for people that are - a lot of people in Texas pay their own way to put themselves through to get certified.”


NEXT STEPS Graham Brent sums it up quite simply: “I think it’s really important to understand that VR certification is not right around the corner.” In effect, this is a first word, not a last word, as these results are potentially taken up for consideration by the NCCCO. Tat said, Brent acknowledges that, “this is really a groundbreaking study. Not just in the construction world, the crane world, but I think Wallace would agree in the certification community.” Wallace Judd echoes that, adding that “We want to


have a lengthier study with more candidates to validate the conclusions that we came to in this study.” However, he goes on to add, “but I don’t think that we could have expected a more positive result from this study.” ITI’s Zack Parnell notes that “we’re still collecting candidate tests in Houston. We’re adding data to this set.” We’ll be watching for more developments in this space! y


To read the full NCCCO Foundation report, visit either of these links: http://www.ncccofoundation.org/can-virtual-reality-play-a-role-in-certification https://www.iti.com/blog/nccco-foundation-report-on-vrs-role-in-crane-operator-certification-testing You can learn more about the NCCCO at www.nccco.org, more about the NCCCO Foundation at www.ncccofoundation.org, and more about Industrial Training International at www.iti.org.


WIRE ROPE EXCHANGE SEPTEMBER–OCTOBER 2020 35


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84