internal and external personnel, including non-executive chairman David Hearn. In practice, “the directors report to the trust and the trustees, holding everything accountable, encouraging energy and being at the top of our game.” The architects claim to champion a “contextual response” in their approach to each brief. Over the course of a six to seven year project, the brief’s essence can gradually be manipulated or even lost. Through exploring the context of a project, Apt respond to this problem by building a project ‘manifesto’: “one sentence that becomes a key thing that excites us about the client’s brief at the project’s outset”, explains Geen. “We keep that at the head of every one of our design reviews amidst all the other opportunities and challenges that come.”


Parker House, a collection of apartments in Covent Garden that brought an old building back to life

From the beginning, the architects always wanted the studio to develop into “a place of trust and fun”

new internal constitution to the outside. Since making the change to being an employee ownership trust – accompanied also by a move of studio – through which Apt retained all its staff. Geen says: “Personally, it has really energised the studio.” As for the name – Apt – the architects chose it not only on linguistic merit; being short and punchy, semantically there was a joint desire for “a single word that would communicate astuteness and resourcefulness.” Geen is also keen to clarify that: “We’re not A-P-T; we’re Apt.” At the time of the rebrand in October, the architects didn’t want to have a big press launch. Instead, clients, family, and friends were invited to a more informal big party as a celebra- tion. “There were a few press releases, but friends promoting the rebrand produced great referrals – a positive ripple,” says Geen.

The practice

Apt – currently made up of 55 individuals – is helmed by three studio leaders; Niall Monaghan, Robin Partington and Geen himself, each of whom are involved in multiple projects at any one time. Then there are four project leaders; the “individuals who drive the talent”: James Ewen, Mark Williams-Jones, Nat Lee and Stephane Piazza. Over the years, Apt has honed a mechanism for driving an energetic approach towards each brief, having established a board of directors and a board of trustees made up of both


Innovative craftsmanship According to Apt, two emblematic words summing up their output are ‘craftsmanship’ and ‘innovation’. Geen substantiates the former referring to Merchant Square, a master plan which enveloped the design for a number of buildings: “One of the things I’m very excited about is materiality. ‘Craft’ would be what materials we thought would resonate with the people, and for Merchant Square, cast iron was chosen.” The architects experimented with the material by cooking it at various temperatures to preserve its aesthetic as well as preventing the surface from rubbing off on the clothing of users: “450 degrees celsius, 550, 600 – it would come out at different colours and textures – the whole process became a journey of material exploration.”

On the subject of innovation, Geen describes a design-stage project in Hammersmith, where the client came to the architects with a brief which was ultimately about scale, the amount of space, and the type of space. Geen explains: “The innovation here appeared when we wrote our manifesto for the project – it was about what the future of the office environment was.” According to Geen, some of the most successful buildings are those which require limited architectural attention for 20-30 years after construction; those that had multiple uses over time and no fixed typology; “from office to residential to education; buildings that morph, change and adapt.” In this same vein, 66 Hammersmith Road incorporates numerous measures that will allow it, once built, to adapt in time to the specific demands of the occupier.

The future for Apt

Other more niche projects that Apt has collaborated on include a room in Oxford’s Bodleian Library, The Treasury, which houses a host of artefacts. “This was a space that we created that is about elegance and simplicity, in which the architecture became secondary. I’d love to see the studio explore more of these things.” Members of Apt’s studio also contributed to an “energised piece of collaboration” with Russian architect Alexander Brodsky on a temporary pavilion, which only had a life of four weeks. Geen notes: “Looking ahead, it would be nice to build on these smaller collaborations.”

Reflecting on their progress until now, Apt has, as one of its core

aims, to communicate and share its projects with a variety of audiences. As the practice’s efforts in creating inspiring architecture in the past have not gone unrewarded, Geen and his colleagues are hopeful that the rebrand will follow suit, embellishing the talent behind the name.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92