search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Rubber Cored Ball 76


Club and ball development still inspires much debate, and in 1921


Harold Hilton wrote in the Aberdeen Press and Journal about how new technology was obliging Hoylake to make changes. “The links,” wrote Harold, “is probably a little too easy for a test in which the cream of the professional world is taking part.” Modern balls traveled 15 yards further than the old on being struck “with every wooden club, making the approach a comparatively simple one with a lofted club” as opposed to “a firm iron shot to a closely guarded green.” The result? The course was lengthened, holes were redesigned “with the object of making the links a severer test.” The rubber cored ball had begun life in 1898 when the concept was patented by Coburn Haskell and perfected in the years that followed.


The Heavy Ball


described it: “One hundred and twelve players took part... The aim is to discover a type of ball which will restrict flight and


77


The following year Hoylake was the setting for a “heavy ball test”. The Manchester Guardian


call for greater skill in the registration of good scores than is required with the small ball now in use.” The balls used had a diameter of 1.705 inches as opposed to 1.62 and were of varying weights. (Eventually - in 1990! - a diameter of 1.68 inches was agreed for all golf balls.) The results of the 1922 test appear to have been inconclusive. While some players reported less distance, “the general conclusion was that the increased size was counterbalanced by the heavier weight and the flight was not diminished.” John Ball recorded 83 “and was emphatic in his opinion that a ‘floater’ is the only possible standard ball which will retain the art and science of the game.” By ‘floater’ he meant one that didn’t sink in water.


The Fruit Machine


revenue generator for almost every golf club in the land. Royal Liverpool was no exception and many a member and visitor was tempted by the prospect of the £100 jackpot, though there was much chuntering from a sedentary position if a visitor walked off with the prize. The annual accounts for 1985 reveal that the spinning drums emblazoned with cherries, oranges and gold bars contributed a remarkable £7,990 to the Club’s finances.


78


Back in the 1980s a fruit machine was an essential


ROYAL LIVERPOOL GOLF CLUB


2019–2020 MAGAZINE


41


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72