search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
TRAINING & EDUCATION


Frank Newberry


Dolphins and Sharks


In this, the first of a two-part article, Communication Skills Trainer Frank Newberry reports on the perils of giving people feedback on their performance at work. In Part 2 (next edition), with more and more people now suggesting we should stop giving feedback altogether - Frank tries to find other ways of getting feedback across – and accepted by people


M


any years ago, when I was a training to be a management consultant, my boss (Mike) felt moved to give me some feedback about my behaviour.


All my adult life I have given people the impression that I am a very happy and confident person who does not need feedback. As a consequence of this, I hardly got any feedback, so this was going to be exciting for me.


Too friendly and too nice


Mike made it clear to me at the outset of our discussion that I was way too friendly and too nice to people. He explained that our team of consultants was made up of dolphins and sharks.


Dolphins were happy and friendly, and everybody loved them. Sharks were ruthless and predatory, everyone admired them but were also scared of them.


He explained that I was very much a dolphin. In fact, one of the lead dolphins. He feared that I would not be tough enough for the job in his unit. He believed that a consultant’s main job was to challenge senior managers and ‘speak truth to power’.


Now, our organisation had a very impressive set of values and policies, but my boss was convinced these were values in name only. He felt that we had a ‘said policy’ (what we say we do) and a separate ‘done policy’ (what we actually do).


Saying one thing and doing another


It was, therefore, my job as an internal management consultant to point out to senior managers in the organisation where I felt they


132 PC February/March 2019


were being hypocritical. Saying one thing and doing another. Before sending me on my way, Mike gave me warning. He said that if he heard from a senior manager,that I was charming, - and I was welcome to come back any time - he would sack me.


If, however, a senior manager called him and complained about me and said s/he never wanted to see me again - Mike would take me out for a slap-up meal and praise my efforts at the next meeting of the whole division.


So, I duly went about my work and, over the years, had a few run-ins with senior managers. None of them ever gave negative feedback about me to Mike.


However, I once felt it necessary to give Mike some personal feedback, in front of everyone, at a divisional meeting. He had just been rude to a visitor at the meeting and I raised my concern about his rudeness after the visitor left. When Mike tried to diminish the feedback that I had given him, I immediately dismissed his assertion - and he gave way.


No more talk of dolphins and sharks


This impressed everyone at the unit meeting - especially me and Mike – I was surprised at what I had said. On reflection, I was only doing as he had previously told me that I must do to keep my job. From then on there was no more talk of dolphins and sharks.


Fast forward to last year when I was running the ninth of ten seminars for GP Surgery Reception teams. The topic was on dealing with difficult (especially angry) patients.


Part of my 3-hour programme was to share with trainees ‘mystery patient’ feedback I had obtained on what each reception team did well and where they needed to improve.


Previous teams I had trained had endured some pretty fierce mystery patient feedback. This included being called ‘arrogant’, ‘ignorant’ and ‘incompetent’. And I have to say they all took it well.


The feedback of a critical friend


However, this ninth team, even though I warned them that they would be getting the feedback of a ‘critical friend’, did not take the feedback at all well. A number of team members instead became abusive towards the (absent) mystery patient and tried to diminish or


change the meaning of the feedback. The session promptly over-ran, and I had to call a break.


During the break, the practice manager (who had not heard the mystery patient feedback) asked me to pack up my kit and leave immediately. She would pay my fee, but her team felt at this point that the training was ‘not of value’.


As I was leaving, another of the team approached me to express her disappointment that the training had been cancelled. She confided that she was leaving the practice soon to work nearby. I wished her well and asked why she was leaving. Her reply? Because ‘they don’t care about patients here’.


I think Mike would have been pleased. It took me over thirty years to get kicked out of my own seminar - by speaking truth to power. I am not sure where my old boss Mike is now but, in his absence, I bought myself a slap-up meal to celebrate.


More and more people are suggesting that we should stop giving feedback at work because it can lead to lower morale and no improvement in performance.


In Part 2, Frank will try to find other ways of getting feedback across - and accepted by its recipients.


© 2018 Frank Newberry A great place to get feedback


A great place to get feedback on your potential as a great supervisor, and to learn how to get your message across to people at all levels in the organisation, is by attending one or more of Grounds Training’s Supervisory Seminars this winter.


Attend one, two, three or all four of them! Taking Charge TBA November 2019 Getting Better Results TBA December 2019


Enhanced Communication Skills TBA January 2020


Problem Solving and Decision Making TBA February 2020


Venue: Allscott Park, Telford TF6 5DY.


For further details and booking visit www.groundstraining.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148