search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Editorial


Rapid prototyping using 3D printing in bioanalytical research


“Advantages of 3D printing for fabrication of bioanalysis prototypes


include reproducibility, high precision, ease of learning, fast building time, and low printing costs.”


First draft submitted: 17 November 2016; Accepted for publication: 5 December 2016; Published online: 10 January 2017


Keywords: 3D-printed analytical devices • 3D printing • microfluidic devices • paper-spray cartridge • rapid prototyping


In bioanalytical research laboratories, 3D printing is no longer just a conception; it has become a useful tool for the fabrication of various analytical devices and custom labware in the past few years. Due to its fast design- to-object workflow, ease of learning and the ability to make complex structures with suf- ficient


resolution, 3D printing technology


has shown its application in biomedical engi- neering, tissue scaffolding, surgical prepara- tion, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, forensic science and medical science [1,2]. Microfluidics is one of the most represented


areas of 3D printing with several review arti- cles describing the latest improvements of the fabrication of novel 3D-printed microfluidic devices. These include the integration of these devices with electrodes, biosensors and valves, and their applications in chemistry and biol- ogy [3–5], such as the analyses of cells and bio- molecules as well as interfaces that enable bio- analytical measurements using cellphones [6]. Applications of 3D printing in other analyti- cal devices have also been reported, such as 3D-printed paper spray ionization cartridge with fast wetting and continuous solvent sup- ply features [7], 3D-printed supercapacitor- powered electrochemiluminescent for protein immunoarray [8], membrane module design with 3D printing technology [9], 3D-printed grinding device for reproducible preparation of nanospray tips [10], and 3D-printed plat- forms for solute delivery, separations and diagnostics [11].


10.4155/bio-2016-0293 © 2017 Future Science Ltd There are a number of interesting examples


in literature about the use of 3D printing in bioanalytical research, and we will highlight just a few here. 3D printing is a promising technique for developing sample-to-device interfaces for limited-resource settings and point-of-care diagnostics. Jue et al. demon- strated a 3D-printed interlock meter-mix device for metering and lysing clinical urine samples [12]. The 3D-printed static mixer contains elements designed to mix urine and lysis buffer that are injected into the device simultaneously. Rapid mixing within the first few static mixer elements was achieved. Gowers et al. described a 3D-printed micro- fluidic device with integrated electrode bio- sensors for continuous monitoring of human tissue metabolite levels, such as glucose and lactate [13]. The 3D-printed microfluidic chip and 3D-printed electrode holder in this wearable device enabled a simple con- nection between the microdialysis probes and electrode biosensors. In addition, a soft 3D-printed elastomer was used to ensure a good seal between electrode holder and microfluidic chip. 3D-printed devices also have been used to increase efficiency dur- ing the drug-development process. Lock- wood et al. showed the parallel in vitro phar- macokinetic profiling of molecules by using a 3D-printed fluidic device [14]. The device con- tained multiple flow channels, and each chan- nel was integrated with porous membrane- based insert wells. The membranes enabled


Bioanalysis (2017) 9(4), 329–331


Chengsen Zhang Author for correspondence: Department of Chemistry & Chemical Biology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA zhang458@iupui.edu


Brandon J Bills Department of Chemistry & Chemical Biology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA


Nicholas E Manicke Department of Chemistry & Chemical Biology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA


part of


ISSN 1757-6180


9


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58