This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
FEATURE SPONSOR


INNOVATIONS & USING NEW TECHNOLOGY DESIGN INVESTMENT


The Carbon Trust has invested in the design of innovative transfer vessels through the Offshore Wind Accelerator, with the aim to be able to transfer the crew in up to 3m significant wave height (Hs) sea states.


Hs, a statistical measure of wave height, is one of the determining factors which affects that most important of factors for bow transfer - the bow displacement and acceleration, although other sea characteristics also do: the current speed and direction, wind speed and direction, wave period and direction also affect when and where the bow moves, so to target the critical requirement to allow the technicians to transfer comes from adapting the vessel design to be less responsive to the environmental conditions expected on location.


Increasing bow friction to increase the force between the fender and the boat landing reduces motion. To increase the friction force, more power from the propellers or jets creates more pressure on the bow, with a limit on the amount of force acceptable in the design of the boat landing itself and the structural strength of the vessel in accommodating the force on the bow.


CONSIDERATIONS There are however downsides, increased friction means the increasing deterioration of surface paints and coatings on the landings, which returns an increased cost and offshore activity of repainting the boat landings.


Also, from an operational perspective, the sudden overcoming of the friction force can disrupt the technician’s judgement and prediction of a suitable time to step across. Intelligent fender systems, such as developed by RG Seasight Fender and Strainstall’s Intelligent Fender System (IFS) sense the force on the bow to give a measurement and visual display to the skipper of the force being applied.


ACTIVE FENDERING SYSTEMS Active fendering systems, such as those designed by BMT Nigel Gee and built into a number of vessels most recently the Njord Magni, are able to reduce the impact forces imposed on the boat landing from the vessel contact. In this case, the middle section of the bow contains an impact damping system which reduces impact loads on contact with the boat landing. A proportion of the impact energy is absorbed by the conventional fender and the remainder is absorbed by the active fender.


REMOTE MONITORING AND INSPECTION


Ultimately there is also the need to reduce the number of visits and to make optimum use of the time on the turbine. Innovation in remote monitoring and inspection reduces the need to transfer personnel for physical inspection. Risk based O&M predictions are based on an understanding of damage or wear regimes according to the loading and environmental conditions.


The long term aim being to achieve site- specific inspection and maintenance regime for each asset, rather than a scheduled periodic inspection. Lloyd’s Register is working to apply Risk Based Inspection through the RBMI software to help achieve this.


THE FUTURE


These techniques rely on condition monitoring and information transfer through the SCADA system, which is well-established, but one can envisage a world of pervasive sensing with embedded sensors such as Metal Embedded Optical Fibre Sensors and long range ultrasonic (LRU) with acoustic emission technique in combination helping improve real-time asset monitoring on a more distributed and asset-wide perspective. A number of joint- industry projects are ongoing in this space.


TWi as part of the Technology Strategy Board funded CM-drive have developed non-contact microphone arrays for structural health monitoring of rotating machinery in the onshore environment.


With sensors located in the nacelle of the structure, acoustic signatures are detected from healthy and worn drivetrains to indicate their relative condition. The combined condition monitoring capabilities including Motor Current Signature Analysis,


Operational Modal Analysis and Acoustic Emission are applied under the CMSWind project funded by the EU under FP7.


Sensors are used to detect the condition of the generator, gearbox bearings and main shaft with the aim of detecting the slip-ring corrosion and shaft/bearing misalignment and wireless sensor technology aims to allow the inclusion of sensors across rotating interfaces.


EXPERIMENTATION


The feasibility of in-service monitoring of the structural health of blades using Acoustic Emission is also being investigated. An experiment, developed at the National Renewable Energy Centre Blade Test Facility, tested a 46 metre long blade in which de-bonding had been initiated.


The blade was tested under fatigue loads using Compact Resonant Masses (CRMs) to excite the blade, accurately simulating in-service load conditions over a 6 week period. During the tests AE monitoring was performed with a sensor network to confirm that it is possible to extract and classify AE events. All promising techniques to help active improved remote monitoring.


SIMPLE ACCESS


Back to the bow of the CTV and the step across to the turbine ladder; innovations in CTV design and contracting are helping the industry move towards increasing accessibility and expanding weather windows in the short term.


But with the prospect of improved analytics of unstructured data derived from remote sensor systems, we also look to a future when remote diagnosis will optimise the use of offshore transfers and specialist support will be remotely provided to technicians to reduce O&M costs.


Lloyds Register


www.windenergynetwork.co.uk


49


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100