EDITOR’S LETTER
Obesity responsibility H
ow should we define obesity – is it a disease, a disability or a lifestyle condition? And why does the definition matter? In fact it matters a great deal, because
the label we use has significant implications for the way people view obesity, and crucially for who’s liable. While ‘disability’ marks it as something to be accepted and lived with, and ‘disease’ gives people an excuse to defer responsibility for their health onto the medical profession, ‘lifestyle condition’ makes the problem seem more reversible, with lifestyle change – our sector’s area of expertise – clearly signposted as the logical solution. So how are we currently defining it? That depends on
where in the world you are: in the US, for example, obesity is now seen as a disease in its own right – not simply the precursor to other diseases such as type 2 diabetes – following an American Medical Association vote last year. But in Europe, the debate has been raging recently over
whether obesity is in fact a disability, thanks to a case brought to the European Court of Justice by a Danish childminder who claims he was sacked for being too fat. The US definition didn’t gain universal approval.
Putting the onus on doctors to step in and provide informed support – and remunerating them for doing so – could in many ways be seen as a positive move. But at the same time, as Dr Chris Beedie of the UK’s Aberystwyth University said at the time, by medicalising the condition “it puts the emphasis on treatment, not prevention, inevitably leading to expensive medical interventions to tackle what is a societal problem”. But if the US decision didn’t win everyone over, the
European debate has had commentators positively up in arms. Should obesity be deemed a disability, the emphasis wouldn’t even be on treatment. Rather, it would be on accommodating obesity, with employers
across the EU facing expensive new obligations to adjust workplaces to cater for obese employees. Quite aside from the impact
on corporates, surely we can’t let this happen? Simply accepting obesity as something to be catered for, rather than a tide to be turned, goes against everything our sector believes in. Indeed, as ukactive CEO David Stalker said when the story broke in June, the European deliberations distract focus from the more fundamental issue: “That obesity is a lifestyle condition that requires a balanced lifestyle, including regular activity and healthy
Should obesity be deemed a disability, the emphasis wouldn’t be on prevention or treatment, but on accommodating obesity
eating. We should really be discussing the best means of delivering this message and the support needed to tackle obesity and other lifestyle conditions.” Stalker makes two important points, categorising obesity
as a lifestyle condition but simultaneously stressing the need to focus not on labels but on solutions – both observations that sit well with the way the fitness sector markets itself. Rather than endlessly defining what the already very evident problem is, let’s invest our energy into finding solutions, following ukactive’s lead in moving the debate away from a focus on obesity towards a focus on physical inactivity.
Kate Cracknell, editor
katecracknell@leisuremedia.com @HealthClubKate
T: +44 (0)1462 431385 W:
www.healthclubmanagement.co.uk E:
healthclub@leisuremedia.com To share your thoughts on this topic, visit
www.healthclubmanagement.co.uk/blog
August 2014 © Cybertrek 2014
Read Health Club Management online at
healthclubmanagement.co.uk/digital
5
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90