This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Fall Liability in


Long-Term Care Facilities by Roger S. Weinberg


Falls are extremely common among


older persons. It is estimated that 30% of non-institutionalized persons over the age of 65 fall every year, and this rate increases with age. Falls in long-term care settings are even higher. Various studies indicate that at least half of the residents in nursing homes and assisted living facilities fall at least once a year. Older persons that do fall often have multiple falls.1


Falls are the major cause


of accidental death for people over age 75.2


Although most falls do not result in


death, many falls can lead to sequelae im- pairing physical functioning and quality of life. Loss of function may be a physical anatomical loss and/or a psychological


1


Rubenstein LZ, Josephine KR (2002) The Epidemiology of Falls and syncope. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine 18, 141-158


2


National Center for Health Statistics (1988) see http://www.NCIPC/wisqurs/ mortrate


loss caused by lack of confidence or fear of falling. Head, hip and spinal fractures are the most debilitating. Liability in nursing home and assisted


living cases follows the same general negligence or malpractice principles as other type personal injury cases. A duty or standard of care must be established. Then a breach of the duty or standard of care must occur which proximately caused the injury. In any case, damages resulting from the injury must be shown. The issue of damages in long-term care cases is beyond the limited scope of this article. As a result of the high risk of falls in


the elderly, especially in settings such as nursing homes and assisted living facilities, the facilities should develop policies, practices and procedures for fall risk assessment, care plans and interven- tions to prevent injuries. In addition to statutory requirements, when facilities advertise and market that they provide


Depo, We’ll Bring The Dom


You Book The 1 DEPO = FREE BOTTLE OFDOM* st


Why would Capital Reporting Company give away a bottle of Dom? It’s simple - we are confident that your first depo with Capital will not be your last! Besides, 1st class companies don't give out pens and magnets!


(410) 685 - DEPO ~ (301) 345 - DEPO Offices throughout Maryland, DC, & Virginia


www.CapitalReportingCompany.com We Never Take Your Business For Granted!


*Deposition must be booked at least 10 days in advance, be at least 3 hours long, and booked before 9/1/07; attorney must be available to personally receive champagne; transcript charge must be paid in full. Limit one bottle per client.


Sponsor


MTLA Silver


3


Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1997


4 420 C.F.R. 483.20 5 CMS’s RAI Version 2.0 Manual 22 Trial Reporter Summer 2007


a “safe nurturing environment”, they create a duty to address fall concerns. In nursing home settings, there are


statutory requirements under both federal and state law. Under federal law (OBRA),3


a Residential Assessment In-


strument (RAI) is required initially and periodically to assess residents entering a skilled nursing facility that receives payments from Medicare or Medicaid.4 The RAI process is based on the follow- ing steps:5


1.Assessment. Taking stock of all observations, information and knowledge about a resident; under- standing the resident’s limitations and strengths; finding out who the resident is


2.Decision-Making. Determining the severity, functional impact, and scope of a resident’s problems; understanding the causes of and relationships between a resident’s problems; discovering the “what’s” and “whys” of resident problems


3.Care Planning. Establishing a course of action that moves a resident toward a specific goal using individual resident strengths and interdisciplinary expertise; crafting the “how” of resident care


4. Implementation.Putting the course of action (specific interventions on the care plan) into motion by staff knowledgeable about the resident care goals and approaches; carry- ing out the “how” and “when” of resident care.


5. Evaluation. Critically reviewing (Continued on page 24)


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76