COMMENT
Greenor growth – can we have both?
Can the introduction of new transport infrastructure be achieved in a sustainable way? Or is there a trade-off between ‘green’ and ‘growth’? Kate Ashley reports from the Labour conference fringe.
S
ustainable transport is a key priority for the rail industry, and a signifi cant
justifi cation for investment: but achieving this requires serious effort and funding.
One priority for the future is integrating different transport modes, which was discussed at a fringe event at the Labour conference attended by RTM.
The event, hosted by Dods Sustainable Transport Dialogue, was chaired by Cllr Peter Box, who is leader of Wakefi eld Council and chair of the LGA Economy and Transport Board.
Discussion focused on how public transport must be supported to replace shorter car journeys, and how intelligent pricing, access and integration with other forms of transport were essential to encouraging this modal shift.
The panel concluded that the two factors were intrinsically intertwined, and that future progress of sustainable transport must embrace both, as Claire Haigh, chief executive of Greener Journeys, said: “You cannot have one without the other, green and growth.”
Incentives
In the debate that followed the speakers’ presentations, some questions from the fl oor touched on setting the right pricing structure to incentivise the use of public transport, the need for cross-modal ticketing and whether HS2 is the best way forward.
On the issue of pricing, Labour’s Dr Alan Whitehead MP considered how the move
towards passengers paying for the majority of rail costs through fares affected the country’s competitiveness.
He said: “We have to compete with other countries where transport is simply much cheaper. It’s about the way in which systems are set up and the same with the ticketing.”
“It is diffi cult,” he admitted and suggested that “instead of trying to lay large bits of new concrete around the country, it would be quite good if we joined up the public transport that we have got; this has got to be a priority.”
A Stop HS2 campaigner pointed out that the most sustainable form of transport was no transport at all – and suggested that broadband improvements could connect people in a more eco-friendly way than big transport projects such as HS2.
The panel accepted her point about the need to reduce transport across the board, but insisted that the implementation of HS2 could free up capacity, which if used to transfer freight from road to rail, would have a signifi cant effect on carbon emissions.
Short distance trips, big effi ciencies
Sandeep Shingadia, sustainability and programmes manager at Centro, discussed the benefi ts of multi-operated ticketing, and highlighted that this was available in the West Midlands across buses, metro and rail. The biggest opportunity for the evolution of this was in smartphone technology, he said.
He reiterated a point posed by other members
of the panel, that short-distance trips, such as the school run, presented the easiest way for sustainable transport to be implemented and generate huge savings.
“This is where sustainable transport works,” he said, “get people out of their cars for short distance trips – you can start to get big effi ciencies on the network, goods and people can move around much more easier, creating benefi ts for us all.”
Haigh added that policy decisions on sustainable transport go far beyond that discipline, stating: “It’s actually education, local government, employment, training, it goes way beyond transport. It needs to go across all areas.”
Joint working
Criticising the Coalition, Dr Whitehead said that “most of the ability for local authorities to work together has been taken apart”, leaving a sub-optimal planning system.
He said: “The outcome of that is that even with funding, the ability to actually introduce the sorts of schemes we’re talking about is seriously curtailed,” adding that councils must work together to facilitate sustainable transport projects through wider regional planning.
“We absolutely need infrastructure that supports low carbon journeys in the future,” he concluded.
TELL US WHAT YOU THINK
opinion@railtechnologymagazine.com
rail technology magazine Oct/Nov 12 | 23
All images © Paul Heartfi eld
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84