mARCH 2012 82 Legal Focus
www.lawyer-monthly.com
Patent Wars: the result of the ‘economic analysis of law’
Patents, as well as intellectual property in general, are hugely complex yet important legal areas, especially within the international corporate arena. Different jurisdictions have different rules, which can be confusing when a company has a global reach. To find out more, Lawyer Monthly speaks to Dr Helen Papaconstantinou, senior partner of Dr Helen Papaconstantinou, John Filias & Associates, to learn about the legal implications surrounding patents in Greece.
The biggest challenge related to patent litigation proceedings in Greece involves the delays faced by litigants before the special IP courts that were recently established in Athens and Thessaloniki, both at first instance as well as on appeal. Moreover, as the competence of said IP Courts is reserved only for the hearing of main proceeding actions, and not for temporary restraining orders and/or injunctions, these end up being heard by the general courts of first instance along with numerous other cases in all legal fields. Therefore, this issue of delay is a key consideration when it comes to deciding whether to actually pursue a case through litigation or attempt an out of court settlement.
Q A further challenge is that even when cases
are being eventually heard in courts, the judges may not always have the technical knowledge or broad understanding of «technical» matters, background and experience to deal with the complexities of patent litigation.
In view of the complexities and delays involved in the patent litigation process, we always advise our clients to take legal action as soon as possible after suspecting an infringement, thus ensuring that they may be able to file a petition for injunction and a temporary restraining order when applicable. If granted, these may constitute powerful early enforcement tools, as proceedings are brief and decisions are issued in a relatively short time after the hearing. Finally, apart from the obvious necessity for early action, we need to be able to convey to the
Q
How do you navigate these challenges?
what are the biggest challenges you face within patent litigation?
court the key basis and elements of any patent infringement without becoming unduly technical on the one hand, while making every effort to substantiate our claims with expert opinions, testimonies and so on. Balancing these two needs, more often than not requires a very delicate handling.”
The ‘patent wars’ might be the result of a model of thinking that is called “economic analysis of law”. This marks surely not the model thinking of the legal departments of the big Telecommunications Companies, but rather the orientation of the executives, who outweigh benefits of actions independently of their legality and costs of enforcement of administrative or judiciary decisions. It is remarkable that in these ‘wars’ the actors just change their roles from one alleged infringement to another, since the actions of the economic subjects seem to take place on a basis of mutuality.
Q A second remark on this issue refers to the
importance of the intersection between all restrictions that are linked to effective IP-rights protection and the necessarily open character of technical standards, mainly in view of their influence on innovation. A big part of the most recent cases of ‘patent wars’ refers exactly to the sensible balance between licensing of patents and implementing technical standards, that are indispensable for keeping an ICT Undertaking in competition.
In my opinion, here is the core of the
problem: how to strike a right balance between exclusion of innovation and fair competition. In my view, the means of compulsory licences should not reach too far, and I would rather plead for the effective implementation of the
Dr. Helen Papaconstantinou, John Filias & Associates 2 Coumbari Street, 10674 Athens, Greece Tel: Fax:
+30 210 362 6624 +30 210 362 6742
Email:
mail@hplaw.biz Website:
www.hplaw.biz
what were your opinions of last year’s ‘patent wars’?
FRAND principle (fair, reasonable and non discriminatory licences) in the spirit of facilitating international trade without ceasing to insist on a vigorous IP-protection.
Q
Do you feel the need for any legislative change within this area?
A new Bill on trademark law, which is due to be voted in early 2012, is expected to further strengthen the rights of trademark owners. This is a welcome development in view of current challenges, although its precise effect remains to be seen. LM
Contact Details:
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114