mARCH 2012
www.lawyer-monthly.com Legal Focus 69 Foreign Investment in India
Looking further into the issues surrounding, Lawyer Monthly speaks to Justin Bharucha, partner at Indian law firm Bharucha & Partners. The firm has three offices in two cities with 38 lawyers and offers expertise in different fields of legal practice with litigation, arbitration, corporate mergers and acquisitions, capital markets and banking finance being its core areas.
Q
Please give me an overview of foreign investment in your jurisdiction currently.
Foreign investment in India is administered by the Government of India, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and, to a limited extent, the Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI). The Government of India acts through the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion of the Ministry of Commerce (DIPP), and the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB). The DIPP formulates policy on foreign direct investment (FDI) circulated by means of ‘press notes’ (consolidated bi-annually), and the FIPB is responsible for implementing this policy. The RBI acts under the provisions of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA) and is empowered to formulate regulations and circulars under the FEMA. The RBI is additionally charged with monitoring and enforcing the regulations. SEBI regulates FIIs and FVCIs.
Over the last two decades India has gradually
expanded the scope of foreign investment.
Foreign investment in India is categorised
into either (ii) Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) or (ii) portfolio investments by foreign institutional investors (FIIs), non-resident Indians (NRIs) and others like foreign venture capital investors (FVCIs).
Over the last two decades India has
gradually expanded the scope of foreign investment. Under the current regime, FDI up to 100% is permitted in most sectors under the automatic route (i.e. without obtaining any prior approval) and foreign investments in only certain sectors requires Government’s approval and is also subject to sectoral caps.
Q
what are your opinions on the recent decision by the Indian Supreme Court in favour of Vodafone, a decision that will allow the company to pursue its plans for its initial public offering in India?
The Vodafone decision should increase in- vestor confidence in India, having reinstated the sanctity of DTAAs and validity of bona fide structures for FDI in India, Effectively, the decision isn't 'new' law - it only dismisses the Indian Revenue's claim to tax offshore transaction under the extant Income Tax Act. Having said that, the potential General Anti Avoidance Rules (GAAR) under the proposed Direct Taxes Code may take away from the effect of this decision and that is a development we will monitor.
Separately, positive investor sentiments
emanating from the Vodafone decision have been marred by another decision of the Supreme Court earlier this month in which it cancelled 122 telecom licences issued to telecom operators in early 2008. While the Supreme Court has, arguably, decided the matter, in fact the decision brings into question the sanctity and bona fides of Indian policy makers. Media reports indicate that the Department of Telecommunications has indicated that as many as 24 issues have arisen, each issue concerning more than one operator, which need to be addressed following this decision and the ramifications are yet to be fully appreciated.
Q
why do you think India is so attractive to foreign investors at the moment?
The foreign investment reforms drive that the Government has demonstrated over a period of time bodes well for the investment scenario in India. This is best exemplified by the recent policy decision allowing 100% FDI in single brand retail despite stiff opposition from certain stakeholders. Also, in recent decisions,
the Supreme Court of India has reaffirmed that the foundations of Indian justice system are based on the rule of law.
Significant reforms to the Companies Act have been pending since 2002. This must be expeditiously implemented. Strictly relating to FDI, the Government of India and RBI must work towards reconciling their conflicting positions on policy decisions: illustratively, on options granted to foreign investors. Another area that is in urgent need of reforms is employment law. LM
Q Contact Details:
what legislative changes do you feel there is a need for?
Justin Bharucha - Partner Bharucha & Partners Hague Building,
9 S S Ram Ghulam Marg, Mumbai 400001
Tel: +91 22 6132 3900 Fax: +91 22 6633 3900
Email:
justin.bharucha@
bharucha.in Website:
www.bharucha.in
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114