mARCH 2012 78 Legal Focus
IP issues with M&A Nigeria
As part of Lawyer Monthly’s Legal Focus on IP issues that arise within M&A transactions, we speak to Uwa Ohiku, a Partner at Nigerian law firm, Jackson, Etti & Edu and Head of the firm’s Intellectual Property Law practice.
Jackson Etti & Edu is one of Nigeria’s most prestigious law firms. A full service law firm offering Corporate Commercial, Litigation/Dispute Resolution and Intellectual Property services, the firm is the undisputed leader in the field of Intellectual Property law. For the last 13 years or so, the firm has been voted, consecutively, as a Tier 1 Law firm for intellectual Property Law by MIP- Managing Intellectual Property, a Euromoney publication. Last year, we were shortlisted for the prestigious IP Law Firm of the year in an Emerging Market award, and at the award ceremony in London in November, Jackson, Etti & Edu was highly commended for its work in this practice area despite challenging circumstances.
Q Q
what are the most common IP-related challenges to arise within mergers and acquisitions in your experience?
• Tangible vs. Intangible Assets - More attention is still being given to
Can you introduce yourself and the firm
tangible assets, to the detriment of intangible assets. A total and complete paradigm shift is required in this respect, to enable IP assets to be adequately assessed during the M&A process.
• Identification of IP Assets – This flows from the preceding paragraph. What exactly are the IP assets of the company/nies? How are they identified? What expertise is available for this? Sometimes, IP practitioners are not brought in at the initial stage of the M & A processes.
• Time constraints: M&As often require intensive investigations and due diligence of the parties involved within set time limits, which may be inconsistent with a thorough enquiry into the myriad of IP issues that can come up. These are: identifying the IPRs, sorting out their recordation status; deciding which ones are valuable and which to be dropped; ensuring they are updated, etc. When the timelines is unrealistic, the IP expert has to ensure that representations, warranties, share adjustment and indemnities of the parties are watertight such that parties may adequately rely on the same.
• Synchronizing the IP Assets of the parties- This may pose some measure of difficulty particularly if a company has to relinquish some or its entire IP assets. Compatibility check of the IP assets for both parties is often necessary.
• Valuation of IP assets- There is a dearth of qualified experts that can value IP assets in the country thus there is difficulty in determining the value of IP assets, as the techniques for valuing tangible assets are grossly inadequate and/or inappropriate, for valuing intangible assets.
• Multiplicity of Legal systems - Trademarks being territorial in nature, registrations obtained in other jurisdictions are not automatically protected in Nigeria and formal steps must be taken to obtain protection for them locally. In cross-border M&As therefore, the differences in the local laws of the parties must therefore be borne in mind, especially where Nigeria is not a signatory to the relevant Conventions which the other party is, such as Madrid Protocol.
• Recordation/Updating Proprietorship Changes (licenses, assignments etc) -
www.lawyer-monthly.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114