mARCH 2012 20 Global Arbitration
www.lawyer-monthly.com
ARBITRATION PORTUGAL
Taking a look at Portugal as part of Lawyer Monthly’s Arbitration Legal Focus, we speak to José Carlos Soares Machado, senior partner of SRS and Head of litigation and arbitration department. José Carlos has 34 years of experience and expertise as a litigation/dispute resolution lawyer. As a litigation expert, José Carlos Soares Machado has a reputation as a tough yet fair trial lawyer, who achieved success in a number of medium and large court cases.
Profile
José Carlos Soares Machado has been involved in several arbitration cases, both as an arbitrator or as a party representative. He has also been involved in the legal process of creating two important arbitration centers, one created in 1992 by the Portuguese Bar Association and the other in 2000 by the Portuguese Property Owners Association.
Mr. Soares Machado was elected
Member of the National Board of the Portuguese Law Society (1993), and President of its Lisbon Council (1996). In 1999, he ran for National President of the Portuguese Law Society and in 2002 was elected Member of its National Supreme Council.
Q
what are the common causes of disputes between businesses in your country, and across borders?
There are many different causes of disputes in Portugal, the most common being contractual liability in all commercial areas of practice, namely in cases that involve discussions in corporate, Mergers and Acquisitions, and Financial Litigation. Real Estate is also very common.
Since 2005, Mr. Soares Machado has been appointed as the representative of the Minister of Justice on the National Supervisory Board of Insolvency Administrators. Additionally, for the last 20 years he has also been heading the Litigation Department of the Portuguese Real Estate Owners Association. He is also a Professor at the Faculty of Law Lisbon Nova University (Universidade Nova de Lisboa).
In addition, Mr. Soares Machado is a
member of the Commercial Arbitration Committee, in the International Law Association, and an arbitrator at the Lisbon Commercial Assocation, the most important Portuguese arbitration Centre.
Q
Is there a typical method of dealing with dispute resolution for all businesses or do you have to employ a specific tactic for foreign companies compared to local companies?
There are no significant differences between national or foreign companies; we have great experience in international disputes, as a consequence of our very old
and strong links with international law firms and multinational companies. In fact, our firm was the first in Portugal to belong to an international net. Usually, American and European companies are much more demanding in strategic procedures discussions, but we deal precisely the same way with the Portuguese companies, which in the end, also benefit from our international experience.
Q
what, in your opinion, are the advantages of arbitration as a dispute resolution method, as opposed to court action?
It’s much faster; you get better quality and reliance when you choose good arbitrators. You avoid the inconvenience of the judicial court, especially the impossibility of knowing who is going to address your case. The confidentiality of the proceedings is also an important factor to consider. These are valid reasons for domestic arbitration.
In international disputes, an arbitral
award is easier to enforce all over the world – that is the most important factor, in my opinion. Of course and again the ability of choosing the arbitrators, particularly in specific areas of business or knowledge, is a relevant advantage.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114