This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
mARCH 2012 www.lawyer-monthly.com Legal Focus


M & As often require that changes in ownership of IPRs be recorded at the relevant IPR office, in favour of the resulting entity and care must be taken to ensure this is scrupulously carried out.


The nature of due diligence required for an M&A is often tailored to the transactional objectives of the parties involved in a potential M&A. Thus, it may be difficult, if not impossible to draw up an exhaustive list of the due diligence involved in an M&A.


Q Detailed hereunder are some of the


core areas to be considered in an IP due diligence:


• Delineation of the IP rights of parties: An appraisal of all files dealing with the IP rights of the parties is necessary. All documents must be scrutinized carefully, to determine what rights they pertain to: patents, trade secrets, trademarks, designs, copyrights,


licensing rights,


confidentiality agreements (NDAs for example), domain names etc. The Strength of the IPRS should be assessed. Trademarks registered more than five years ago should be in use or may be faced with possible non-use actions and eventual removal from the Registry’s records. Verification/Confirmatory searches at the Trademarks, Patents and Designs Registries are necessary to determine the actual status of the IPRs and to ensure they are updated appropriately. Depending on the nature of the IPRs, similar searches may be required at the Copyright Commission as well as the National Office for Technology Acquisition and Promotion (NOTAP). Care must be taken to ensure that inventions in particular and IPRs generally, are owned by the relevant corporate entities and not by employers, with


Although, there are IP contentious issues that arise during M&A, very few end up in court. Such issues are usually settled out of court and the terms of settlement made a judgment of the Federal High Court for sake of enforcement.


Q Q


Have there been any significant


changes recently?


There have been no significant legislative changes in terms of M & As, in spite of the rise of such transactions in the country. The Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) however


legislative


Are there many cases of IP- related litigation that arise with the M&A market?


Uwa Ohiku: Partner, Head


Intellectual Property Department


JACKSON, ETTI & EDU 3-5 Sinari Daranijo Street, Off Ajose Adeogun, Victoria Island, Lagos. Nigeria


Mob: +234 8034529339 Email: uwaohiku@jacksonettiandedu.com Website: www.jacksonettiandedu.com


what due diligence should companies carry out?


the required assignment of invention agreements promptly executed in favour of the corporate entities.


• Identification of the existence of any defects in title i.e. pending oppositions, cancellation actions or litigations- All ‘defects’ in the title of IPRs involved in M & As must be ascertained. An Infringement case against one of the parties for example, would be of concern.


• Verification of proprietorship of valid licenses and IP rights: It is also important to ensure that the extent of the rights owned are in tandem with the entire purpose of the M&A and appropriate licenses for the use of the IP assets and various technologies have been duly obtained. A practical way to do this would be to review all agreements between the parties and third parties.


• Need for 3rd party license should be disclosed: There is a need to confirm whether or not the intellectual property and technology available is necessary for the resulting entity to conduct its business.


79


recently promulgated new rules for M&A contained in Rules 420-439 of the Amended Sec Rules and Regulations 2011. The SEC rules are a subsidiary legislation made pursuant to the Investment Security Act, 2007.


Our review of rules 420-439, indicated


that there were no IP specific provisions contained therein. LM


Contact Details:


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114