research framework for identifying research needs. Case: bioenergy- biodiversity interlinkages. Edita Prima Ltd, Helsinki.
29. Richardson, K., Steffen, W., Schellnhuber, H. J., Alcamo, J., Barker, T., Kammen, D. M., Leemans, R., Liverman, D., Munasinghe, M., Osman-Elasha, B., Stern, N. & O., W. Year. Synthesis Report. In: Cli- mate Change: Global Risks, Challenges and Decisions, 10-12 March 2009. Copenhagen, Denmark. University of Copenhagen.
30. UNEP/CMS Secretariat. 2010. List of all countries in the World in- dicating their participation in CMS and its Agreements and MOUs. UNEP/CMS Secretariat. http://www.cms.int/about/part_lst.htm [Ac- cessed 05 October 2010].
31. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP). 2009. AMAP Assessment 2009: Human Health in the Arctic. Arctic Moni- toring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), Oslo, Norway, 256 pp.
32. ASEAN Centre for Biodiversity. 2009. An Action Plan for Harmoni- sation of Reporting to Biodiversity-related Conventions in the ASE- AN Region. ASEAN Workshop on harmonisation of reporting to bi- odiversity-related conventions output document. Ha Noi, Viet Nam.
33. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). 2010. Article 8(j): Tra- ditional Knowledge, Innovations and Practices. Concention on Bio- logical Diversity. http://www.cbd.int/traditional/ [Accessed 13 August 2010].
II
Impressions of the Arctic 1. Arctic Climate Impact Assessment (ACIA). 2005. Arctic Climate Impact Assessment., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1042 pp.
2. Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF). 2010. Arctic Biodi- versity Trends 2010 - Selected indicators of change. CAFF Interna- tional Secretariat, Akureyri, Iceland, May 2010.
Wolverines 1. Abramov, A., Belant, J. & Wozencraft, C. 2009. Gulo gulo. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, Version 2010. 2. www.iucnredlist.org [Ac- cessed 18 November 2009].
2. Landa, A., Lindén, M. & Kojola, I. 2000. Action Plan for the con- servation of Wolverines (Gulo gulo) in Europe. Council of Europe Publishing, EU.
3. Andersen, R., Linnell, J. D. C., Brainerd, S. & Hustad, H. (eds.) 2003. Large predators and human communities in Norway. A guide to coex- istence for the 21st century. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, 48 pp.
4. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSE- WIC). 2003. Assessment and update status report on the wolverine Gulo gulo in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wild-
life in Canada. Ottawa, Canada, vi + 41 pp.
5. Moore, P. & Wheelock, A. 1990. Wolverine myths and legends: Dené traditions from northern Alberta. Compiled by Dené Wodih Society, 259 pp + xxv.
6. IUCN/SSC Working Group on Large Carnivore Initiative for Europe. Large carnivores know no boundaries: the European populations of large carnivores at a glance. http://www.lcie.org/Docs/LCIE%20 IUCN/POP_Brochure_small.pdf [Accessed 26th January 2010].
7. Larsson, O. 2005. Status and distribution of wolverines, Gulo gulo, in Sweden. 1st National Symposium on Wolverine Management and Research. June 13-15, 2005. Jokkmokk, Sweden.
8. Van Dijk, J. 2005. Status and Distribution of Wolves in Norway. 1st National Symposium on Wolverine Management and Research. June 13-15, 2005. Jokkmokk, Sweden.
9. Novikov, B. 2005. The contemporary condition of Wolverine popula- tions in Russia. 1st National Symposium on Wolverine Management and Research. June 13-15, 2005. Jokkmokk, Sweden.
10. Temple, H. J. & Terry, A. 2007. The Status and Distribution of Euro- pean Mammals. Compiled for the Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Luxembourg, viii + 48pp.
11. Artsdatabanken. 2006. Rødlistebased (Red list database). http:// www.artsdatabanken.no [Accessed 6th January 2010].
12. Slough, B. 2007. Status of the Wolverine Gulo Gulo in Canada. Wild- life Biology. 13: 76-82.
13. United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2008. North American wol- verine (Gulo gulo luscus). http://www.fws.gov/ecos/ajax/speciesPro- file/profile/speciesProfile.action?spcode=A0FA [Accessed 26th Jan- uary 2010].
Reindeer and caribou 1. Forbes, B. C. & Kumpula, T. 2009. The ecological role and geogra- phy of reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) in Northern Eurasia. Geography Compass. 3: 1356-1380.
2. CircumArctic Rangifer Monitoring and Assessment (CARMA) Net- work. http://carmanetwork.com/display/public/Herds [Accessed 15 January 2009].
3. Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF). 2007. Reindeer and Caribou Biodiversity Factsheet. http://caff.arcticportal.org/arctic-in- focus/225-reindeer-and-caribou [Accessed 15 December 2009].
4. Vistnes, I., Burgess, P., Mathiesen, S. D., Nellemann, C., Oskal, A. & Turi, J. M. 2009. Reindeer Husbandry and Barents 2030: Impacts of future petroleum development on reindeer husbandry in the Barents region. International Centre for Reindeer Husbandry. Kautokeino, Norway.
5. Arctic Climate Impact Assessment (ACIA). 2005. Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1042 pp.
PROTECTING ARCTIC BIODIVERSITY 89