This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
New Applications such as Superdosing of Phytase to Maximize Phytate Destruction to Improve Performance while Minimizing Nutrient Excretion in Poultry


By C. L. Walk and T. York, AB Vista


It is well documented that phytase supplementation in broiler diets improves P and Ca utilization through the destruction of phytate (IP6) and thereby allows for the reduction of inorganic phosphate in the diet. Phytase is supplemented in approximately 95% of the poultry diets globally with the majority of the use associated with reduced diet cost and reduced phosphorus (P) excretion. For the purpose of this paper, this type of phytase supplementation will be referred to as the standard dose of phytase, normally around 500 FTU/kg. Superdosing is a relatively new term used to describe phytase


supplementation at ≥ 1,500 FTU/kg (Walk et al., 2014) or ≥ 2,500 FTU/ kg (Adeola and Cowieson, 2011). This is predominantly associated with improvements in feed efficiency by 3-5 FCR points (Walk et al., 2013, 2014) through the rapid and nearly complete destruction of IP6 and the provision of inositol (Adeola and Cowieson, 2011; Walk et al., 2014). Through near complete destruction of IP6, more P is released from the phytate molecule, and other nutrients such as iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), and sodium (Na) become more available to the animal as well. Therefore, superdoses of phytase could have multiple uses towards achieving sustainable poultry


production; this is associated with improvements in feed efficiency, mineral utilization, and poultry products, with specific consideration regarding fast growth, minerals and breast meat myopathies.


Superdoses of Phytase Feed Efficiency Superdosing phytase has been defined as supplementing phytase greater than 2 to 5 times the standard phytase dose without taking the full nutrient matrix. Published data has indicated supplementing broiler diets with superdoses of phytase (1,000 or 1,500 FTU/kg) significantly improved feed conversion ratio of 35- (Santos et al., 2013) or 49-day-old broilers (Walk et al., 2013; Table 1). However, there was no significant effect of superdoses of phytase on feed intake or BW gain (Santos et al., 2013; Walk et al., 2013, 2014), and no effect of additional dietary inorganic P on performance or feed efficiency (Walk et al., 2013, 2014). Therefore, the influence of superdoses of phytase on FCR can be described as ‘extra-phosphoric’ and has been loosely correlated with the near complete destruction of phytate into inositol in the gizzard (Walk et al., 2014; Table 1).


Table 1: Influence of Superdoses of Phytase on Broiler Performance from Hatch to Day 49 Post-hatch and Gizzard Phytate or Inositol Concentration on Day 21


Experimental diets PC3


PC + dicalcium PO4 PC + 500 FTU/kg


NC4


NC + 500 FTU/kg NC + 1,000 FTU/kg NC + 1,500 FTU/kg SEM


P-value Intake1 , g


6,371 6,444 6,430 6,240 6,344 6,378 6,350 81


0.69


1 Adapted from Walk et al., 2013. 2 Adapted from Walk et al., 2014.


Negative control, nutrient adequate according to breed recommendations with the exception of Ca, available P, and Na which were reduced 0.16, 0.15 and 0.03%, respectively.


3 Positive control, nutrient adequate according to breed recommendations. 4


PAGE 42 MAY/JUNE 2017 FEED COMPOUNDER BW gain1


3,475 3,453 3,539 3,462 3,497 3,529 3,551 55


0.80 , g FCR1 , g:g


1.835ab 1.868a 1.817bc 1.834ab 1.815bc 1.808bc 1.790c 0.015 0.01


Gizzard Phytate (IP6)2


, µmol/g


2.85ab 3.93a 0.21c 1.91b 0.04d 0.00d 0.00d 0.02


0.0001


Gizzard Inositol2 µmol/g


0.91c 0.88c 1.15bc 1.21b 1.57b 2.12a 2.22a 0.10


0.0001 ,


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68