NORTH AMERICA
he United States has, for many years, remained one of the top international relocation destinations. Some studies suggest that this is due to the quality of life that can be found there, especially for families. However, in the 2015 Brookfield Global Mobility Trends Survey, the US featured in the top three countries with the highest rate of international assignment failure. It is clear, then, that understanding the education, schooling and family issues that assignees will face on making a move to the US should be top of the list of priorities for professionals assisting with a family move. In the latest HSBC Expat Explorer survey, the US came out top for lifestyle for newly-relocated employees. A high number of expats even reported enjoying new luxuries and experiencing a good quality of life – in short, they were living the American Dream. The survey indicated that the US’s strong healthcare and education systems played a significant part in its ranking in the top ten of the Raising Children Abroad league table. However, families relocating to the US looking for places for their children in state schools (known there as public schools) are first struck by how significantly the education systems and end-of-school measurements of achievement vary from state to state, and even between districts within the same state. This is because individual states’ departments of education are responsible for the funding and administration of schools.
T
“This means that there has always been a huge variation in content and structure across the United States,”
Left: British International School of Chicago Keep Informed |
relocateglobal.com | 183
says Elizabeth Sawyer, CEO of Bennett Schoolplacement Worldwide. “While some schools are teaching evolution, for example, others are teaching only Bible-based explanations of our origins. There has been no national exam like the French Baccalaureate or the English A Level with which students earn a secondary diploma, and, overall, no shared standards.
“This is not to say that education has been poor across the public system,” Ms Sawyer is keen to stress. “Rather, it has been enormously varied; while some schools have been woefully sub-par, others have successfully prepared students for the most academically-rigorous universities in the country.” In 2009, the National Governors Association launched the Common Core State Standards, to reduce the current confusion of public-education policies and create some level of shared education benchmarks across states. So far, 43 states, the District of Columbia, and four territories have signed up. The initiative is designed to reduce the disparity in education standards across states, districts and schools, but the jury is still out as to how successful the effort has been. While some states and school districts continue to
embrace the Core Standards programme enthusiastically, others remain sceptical. Given the historical independence of US states and a natural tendency to resist regulation by any one overarching body, it will inevitably take time for education to become more uniform from state to state, and for schools and districts to gain a sense of what the Core Standards have or have not provided.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188 |
Page 189 |
Page 190 |
Page 191 |
Page 192 |
Page 193 |
Page 194 |
Page 195 |
Page 196 |
Page 197 |
Page 198 |
Page 199 |
Page 200 |
Page 201 |
Page 202 |
Page 203 |
Page 204 |
Page 205 |
Page 206 |
Page 207 |
Page 208 |
Page 209 |
Page 210 |
Page 211 |
Page 212 |
Page 213 |
Page 214 |
Page 215 |
Page 216 |
Page 217 |
Page 218 |
Page 219 |
Page 220 |
Page 221 |
Page 222 |
Page 223 |
Page 224 |
Page 225 |
Page 226 |
Page 227 |
Page 228 |
Page 229 |
Page 230 |
Page 231 |
Page 232 |
Page 233 |
Page 234 |
Page 235 |
Page 236