This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Opposite: trimmer’s nightmare. The highly complex graphics on Richard Mille watches’ European boss Peter Harrison’s Sorcha would stand good comparison with the best naval camouflages employed in the Battle of the Atlantic 70 years ago. Grand prix fleet, grand prix venue (left), the TP52s pay the quasi-ritualistic annual visit to Porto Cervo now enjoyed by most premier fleets


lane in traffic, or of fast manoeuvring, and so what on paper seems a fair rating can in practice offer good scope for advantage for those prepared to ‘invest’ more heavily. With class rules, if you can convince the members, you can to


marina access. Typically in the 52ft size range it pays to go deeper than the 3.5m TP52 class limit if you are focusing on IRC; but only of course if the deeper draft is matched by not just a longer fin but also adjustments in bulb weight, boat weight and, I guess for the very top end, further adjustments aloft in sail shapes and trim. It is a trend that potentially was always there and in which the


TP52 class pointed the way by increasing the class draft limit, reducing the boat weight and increasing sail area. But if one is not restricted by class rules and event rules, nor


by issues of funding, it can be a long and winding road before one realises that optimisation never stops, since part of it is driven by what your competitors do and another part by the rulemakers’ nasty habit of moving the goalposts if they feel that the sailors are getting too close to weaknesses in their handiwork. If you then also race inshore as well as offshore and realise gains


can be made by optimising differently for those formats (and not just in the sail department) then it will be demotivating to see how limitless funding indeed can buy speed and rating advantage. Also, rating rules do not recognise the importance of holding a


some extent control extreme spending, or at least moderate the pace and point the strategic bow in a more sensible direction with the focus on longterm progress. Easy to set a limit on draft, use of materials, bulb and keel maximum weight, and so on. However, there comes a moment when one gets too far out of phase with trends and taking advantage of rating imperfections (like on draft) that, with a class like the TP52, where our boats find their principal secondhand market in the corrected time arena, you are more or less forced to streamline things in anticipation of your after-market. Of course, where this streamlining directs us in undesirable directions we can try to make the rulemakers see the light, but there we are often viewed as the odd uncle with the Ferrari at a party of family members arriving in Mondeos. The medium-term effect of not catering for the true racers is, however, a continuous flow of money down a drain that creates more frustration than fun. Of course, trying to outspend the competition is at the root of the frustration and a quick look in the mirror is needed here. But I feel the rule administrators can help by setting even some arbitrary limits that for a certain number of years will help to stabilise typeforming and thus spending. And maybe, as with draft, it also helps us to find a berth at the


events that we like to race. Commercial harbours are not really palm tree resorts… My five cents’ worth.


Rob Weiland, manager, 52 Super Series 


performance hardware & rigging systems .com


Online-shop for performance sailing systems


t: +49 431 220 2140 (24/7) m: support@upffront.com


 


 


 


R


www.upffront.com SEAHORSE 27


TOMAS MOYA


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89