search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
REFRIGERANTS


How to avoid going back to the future


John Poole of Refrigerant Solutions talks about the development of refrigerant gases in relation to the development of equipment.


F


rom the late 19th century to the 1920s, commonly used refrigerants were markedly hazardous, notably


hydrocarbons (flammable), methyl chloride (flammable and toxic), sulfur dioxide (toxic) and ammonia (flammable and toxic). Non- flammable carbon dioxide was limited by its very high pressure and low critical temperature to industrial refrigeration, including refrigerated ships, where other refrigerants presented too great a risk. Chlorofluorocarbons (R11, R12, R114)


and hydrochlorofluorocarbons (R22) were commercialised in the 1930s and grew rapidly after the war, the range being extended by azeotropes R502 and R500. But in the 1970s CFCs and HCFCs were found to destroy stratospheric ozone, so are now being phased out under the Montreal Protocol. These nonflammable, low toxicity and efficient fluids have largely been replaced by hydrofluorocarbons having similar properties, but which crucially do not deplete ozone. Nevertheless, they have high direct Global Warming Potentials (GWP) and themselves are now being phased down globally. Wherever you stand in the debate


around global warming, ever increasing regulations


internationally are being enacted, targeted at reducing the emissions of global warming gases. But reducing perceived environmental impacts must not be achieved by exposing customers and engineers to extra risks inherent in the use of the hazardous fluids common in the early days of refrigeration. Despite HFCs directly contributing less than 2% to the global warming attributed to human activity, the GWPs of HFCs are increasingly being targeted by international regulations, such as the Kigali amendment to the Montreal Protocol, for phasing them down. In particular, the European F Gas regulation is a flawed legislative instrument that ignores the indirect warming impact of carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel combustion to generate the power needed to run the equipment. Since the refrigeration and air-conditioning industry (RAC) is a significant consumer of energy, increased efficiency must be a key in any sustainable future strategy. The F Gas Regulation imposes excessive economic


costs on the purchasers of refrigeration and air conditioning equipment for minimal environmental gain. But accepting that HFC phase down is a


‘done deal’, future refrigerants will need the lowest possible GWPs combined with high efficiencies and inherent safety. The so- called natural refrigerants, promoted by


18 December 2020


www.acr-news.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44