This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Frequency Control & Microwave


The unexpected cost of low cost microwave antennas


Microwave antennas form an essential part of modern mobile communication networks, providing the majority of backhaul provision between cell sites and core networks. In this article, Donald Gardner, product line manager within the Microwave Antenna Systems team at CommScope, talks about the pressure to minimise costs and why this is happening


more in the long-run when the total cost of ownership (TCO) is considered. Let me explain by first reviewing some of the factors that drive cost in a microwave antenna.


Donald Gardner R


easons for using microwave links in preference to fibre include speed of deployment, reduced cost of ownership compared to leased capacity and the proven reliability of the technology. However, even with microwave rollouts, there is a lot of pressure to minimise costs. Some choose to do this through the use of cheap antennas; however, this can actually cost


Antenna design and the RF path The design of a microwave antenna breaks down into two broad areas, although there is some overlap between them. The first of these is the RF path, which mainly comprises the feed system, the reflector and the radome. Assuming the antenna is correctly designed, the key driver to consistent performance is control of shape, symmetry and size. Failure to accurately control the shape of various components will mean the antenna will not deliver the required gain, pattern, cross-polar performance (XPD) and return loss. Similarly, failure to control the symmetry of the antenna means the antenna will not be uniformly illuminated; this has a major impact on pattern, XPD and, in the worst cases, antenna gain. Where the size requirements are not maintained, components will not assemble correctly, leading to potential RF leakage and loss of pattern compliance. The second area is the mounting and alignment of the antenna. The antenna must survive and operate in the worst


conditions possible, but at the same time be simple and straight forward to install and align. From the above, it can be seen there


are several key cost drivers for microwave antennas:


1. Components must be designed to


proper tolerances to ensure that RF performance requirements are achieved. 2. The relationship between components must be tightly controlled to guarantee RF performance. 3. The overall design must be stiff enough to ensure that items 1 and 2 above are maintained over the operational performance envelope of the antenna. Poor manufacturing processes result in noncompliance to specification. Figure 1 shows a tested non-CommScope product that breaches regulatory specifications in several places. Further analysis indicated that, in addition to poor manufacturing processes causing the issues in the 0-90 degree region (blue arrows), compromises in the design, presumably for cost purposes, meant that, in the 90-180 degree region, the antenna would not be able to meet regulatory specification despite compliance being claimed.


antennas not meeting performance is likely to be extremely expensive. The costs associated in deploying field crews alone may be an order of magnitude larger than any initial antenna cost, even before the costs in lost traffic are taken into consideration.


Thus, we arrive at one of the issues It is not realistic to measure every


microwave antenna electrically for all parameters during the manufacturing process, since this requires the use of a test range. Instead, reliance is placed on measurement of mechanical characteristics such as compliance of reflector shape to tolerance as well as electrical tests such as return loss. To support this, a random sample of factory production is then subjected to full electrical test, the same tests as used to verify the initial design to ensure that all product consistently meets specification.


Figure 1: Testing reveals a radiation pattern (RP) outside of specification, rendering the antenna noncompliant


44 June 2016 Components in Electronics


Total cost of ownership Total cost of ownership (TCO) involves much more than the cost of the antenna itself. It also includes the initial costs of site acquisition; tower or mast requirements; electronic equipment such as radio, antennas and installation; as well as the ongoing operational cost of the network. Over the full life of the antenna, the antenna purchase price is, in fact, a very small percentage of the TCO. However, attempting to identify and remedy poor performance in the network caused by


inherent in any large organisation: different parts pursuing potentially conflicting goals. The purchasing group may be pursuing a minimal total capital spend; however, without a full awareness of the parameters of the product they are purchasing, initial savings may result in a far greater negative impact elsewhere in the organisation. No one would claim that initial capital costs are not important; it is absolutely essential that they are fully controlled. However, it must be done in the context of total rather than simply initial cost.


The question then is how this can be done. The solution is relatively simple; all items in the backhaul chain must be treated with due diligence rather than as commodity items purchased in isolation. It means knowing the provenance of all such equipment - that is, who actually manufactures it, to whose designs, and under what system of controls. It also demands great communication between different groups within the organisation, from network architects, link planners, rollout and maintenance teams through to contract management and purchasing teams. Only this broader understanding reveals TCO and facilitates smart spending decisions.


www.commscope.com www.cieonline.co.uk


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56