Enclosures
Putting the cart before the horse… why early enclosure selection ensures efficient product design
Our experience shows us that design engineers tend to follow a logical sequence when a new product is being designed. It goes something like this: first there is the brief, then the design, sourcing components for the assembly and then finally finding a housing to enclose the whole lot. Although this seems reasonable, by actually following this sequence many things can start to go wrong, just when time is of the essence and pre- production is about to take place. Paul Raynor, JPR Electronics, explains
What happens when it is W
hat if the final assembly is too big for an available enclosure? Diecast
enclosures are invariably more expensive as the depth required increases. The die required for a deep casting is not easy to create and such manufacturing tools are invariably a high cost item; even when amortised over the final selling price of the casting. A tall assembly limits the choice of enclosure, increasing the time required to find a suitable housing. A larger box than actually required means paying extra for unnecessary space, a smaller box may need a circuit or component redesign. More time, more money. Some equipment manufacturers choose to make their own custom tooling, adding time and expense to their production costs and increasing their risk if the product doesn’t sell well. What if all is ready to go into
production but the chosen enclosure isn’t in stock and has a long lead time? Only limited options are available: choose an alternative enclosure with possible redesign of components or simply wait until the stock is available. Both choices entail frustration, delays and possibly lost sales. What if the chosen enclosure is cheap, the right size, readily available initially and then either loses quality or is no longer available once full scale production of the project is taking place? Company credibility suffers when explaining to clients and their end customers that their heavily promoted product has to undergo changes in size, shape and cost.
www.cieonline.co.uk
discovered that the IP rating, the flammability rating or EMC rating of the project design depends on a special enclosure? Enclosures with special ratings have correspondingly high prices and should be included in the budget from an early stage. These are all typical examples of what I call “putting the cart before the horse.” I suggest trying a different scenario, designing from the outside – in, where choosing an enclosure comes right at the very beginning of the process of product development. Once the brief is decided it will be known whether the enclosure needs to be weather proof, have special IP or flammability ratings.
Once the type of enclosure is decided, the next step is to choose an ideal size for the product and design to fit the box. The process becomes infinitely more efficient and cost effective.
By making early decisions over
enclosures any customisation can be agreed and time and money can be saved. By designing circuitry to fit the enclosure, costings are already in place and sizing of the product is already well defined. Changes can be implemented if necessary either to the circuitry or to the enclosure while there is still time but when the enclosure is deemed satisfactory, it can be ordered ahead so that production can proceed without time lost waiting for stock to arrive. Of course, it is important to
ensure that there is reliability of quality and continuity of supply. Cheap may be attractive initially but as many OEMs have found to their dismay, often cheap items may have a quality problem or simply don’t appear once production is underway. If the customer is willing to place a scheduled order, they will ensure that buffer stocks are held for the customer to be delivered as and when they are required. JPR only work with reputable, well established suppliers who are able to produce quality products over the long term, hence their growing relationship with Hammond Manufacturing. JPR’s close working relationship
with Hammond along with their excellent facilities in guiding customers, help them to make the right choices early on in the process. CAD drawings of enclosures are easily downloaded so that specifications can be integrated right from the beginning. Machining, printing and drilling are carried out in the factory, all saving time and money. We have found that by working together with our customers and key suppliers like Hammond from the start of a new product, design and production times are optimised. There are less false starts and frustrations and the end product is on time and on budget. The horse and cart are a team, not just separate entities.
By taking a holistic approach to design it is common sense to choose first the item that is the most difficult to alter at a later stage. It is a fallacy to assume that in the last stages of the project design, it will be easy to find an appropriate enclosure from the thousands available. Decision making at this point is time consuming and often fruitless. While components and circuitry can often simply be reorganised so that internal form alters while still maintaining function, the enclosure can only remain static.
The moral is, of course, to choose the enclosure first.
www.jprelec.co.uk Components in Electronics July/August 2017 33
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92
