FEATURE PLANT & PROCESS ENGINEERING
KEEPING COOL WHEN the challenge is process variables
The key to efficient cooling is often maintaining the droplet size of the spray. BETE has developed the spill back system which achieves this even when there is a drop in flow rate
T
he need to cool a range of media including gases is important in many
process applications and often achieved by injecting an atomised spray of cool fluid into a gas flow. The atomised spray is usually propelled through spray nozzles and consists of many small droplets over a large surface area. This ensures that the droplets will quickly exchange heat and evaporate in the gas stream - the latent heat of the phase change to gas will be removed from the hot gas, resulting in rapid and efficient cooling. The key to efficient cooling is often
maintaining the droplet size of the spray. A small droplet size will result in a bigger surface area per volume of fluid and thus a great interaction with the gas. However, smaller droplets tend to get swept along in a gas flow more rapidly and so may have a reduced residence time, meaning less time to exchange heat. Gas cooling systems will need to be designed around maintaining specific spray properties to maximise efficiency. This means that any variation in droplet size may negatively impact the effectiveness of the cooling system.
VARIABLE COOLING PROBLEMS Getting the right cooling spray is relatively simple when the cooling load is constant. Simply calculate the required heat energy that needs to be removed from the system and match this with the energy required to bring the cooling fluid to equilibrium, normally via a phase change. Then the droplet size required to achieve thermal equilibrium in a reasonable time can be calculated and the correct nozzle(s) can be selected. However, if the load on the cooling system is likely to vary - things become more complex. In many applications the amount of gas needing to be cooled and the temperature may vary. At first glance it may seem a simple enough problem to solve: simply increase the flow from the nozzles by increasing pressure to compensate for any higher gas flows or additional cooling required. The problem with this simplistic
approach is that flow rate is not the only fluid property changed by increasing the
26 MAY 2016 | FACTORY EQUIPMENT
pressure drop across the nozzle. Most importantly droplet size is likely to change which will drastically affect cooling. Increasing pressure to deliver additional flow will lower the droplet size of the spray and this may result in a more rapid heat exchange, although as noted above, the residence time of the smaller droplets will fall. This problem is compounded by the
fact that hotter, larger gas flows will tend to be moving more rapidly. This can actually result in less cooling per volume of fluid despite the smaller droplet size because the droplets are simply moving too fast to evaporate. Not only will this reduce the efficiency of the cooling system it may overload any mist eliminators. Conversely, decreasing pressure to reduce the flow will increase the droplet size. This reduces the surface area of the spray and thus diminishes its cooling effect in a given time slot. As the droplets are now bigger they will take longer to evaporate and so may not achieve complete evaporation in the time required. Partial evaporation can dramatically reduce the amount of cooling because latent heat is normally the biggest component of the heat transfer. Additional problems may occur if the cooling fluid is only partially evaporated.
MULTIPLE NOZZLES One option is to use multiple nozzles. If this is feasible a step change of nozzles
Flow diagram of spill back lance nozzle
can be used to increase or decrease cooling while keeping the spray properties (droplet size) consistent. However, it can only move in discrete quanta of sprays. With a 4-nozzle system one could have 1, 2, 3, or 4 /min and nothing in between those steps.
TRULY EFFICIENT COOLING If the cooling load was known to fall in several discrete categories then this might be acceptable. However, this is leaving things to chance when the objective is truly efficient cooling. In an ideal world what’s required is a cooling system that can deliver a spray with a consistent droplet size but whose volume can be varied without affecting that drop size. If this nozzle could be controlled by a temperature sensor then more or less fluid can be delivered as the temperature varies. This would result in a stable cooling of the gas, even as gas flows and initial temperature varies.
SPILL BACK SYSTEM One effective and proven solution which has been developed by The Spray Nozzle People (BETE) is the spill back system. This works by atomising the fluid via a swirl chamber and then returns a portion of the fluid back up the lance to be recirculated. In this way, only a portion of the pumped fluid is actually ejected from the nozzle orifice. The proportion of fluid that is ‘spilled
Spill back lance
back’ can be controlled by varying the pressure differential between the spill back channel and the feed channel. Therefore, if the pressure of the main inlet fluid is equal to the pressure on the spill back channel, no fluid will be spilled back. By lowering the pressure of the spill back channel a proportion of the feed spray will be diverted back away from the nozzle. The important thing with this method is that the pressure differential across the nozzle orifice remains unchanged and so the spray characteristics including droplet size will not change as the flow rate drops.
BETE T: 01273 400092
www.bete.co.uk
/ FACTORYEQUIPMENT
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48
