Special Works
Optioneering helps Midcoast Water transform Gloucester water network into
a reliable, efficient system WaterGEMS Helps Identify a Solution to Increase Service Levels and Reduce Operations and Maintenance Costs by Over 75 Percent
MidCoast Water delivers water and sewerage services to 40,000 households in the Manning, Great Lakes, and Gloucester communities of New South Wales in Australia. It also supplies 8 billion liters of water a year to Karuah in the south, Crowdy Head in the north, and Gloucester in the west.
In 2011, MidCoast Water accepted responsibility for the operation of the aging water and sewer networks in the Gloucester Shire Council area. The Gloucester water distribution network, parts of which date back to 1914, involves three reservoirs and seven booster pumps. Residents experienced water pressure fluctuations as the entire water system relied on booster pumps, which switched on and off based on downstream pressures.
A combination of pump and pipe failures also caused outages. At one point, many residents remained without sufficient water for a couple of days, with 11 main breaks and one leak reported in Gloucester over a 24-hour period.
MidCoast Water sought to find a solution that would increase the residents’ level of water services while reducing the system’s reliance on booster pumps. This would subsequently reduce the ongoing energy use required to operate the system. Using WaterGEMS, MidCoast Water was able to assess over 100 what-if scenarios and to select the optimal solution that would improve the network performance while minimizing energy use.
Water Network Engineering Challenges
The Gloucester water network stretches north to south over a very hilly 15 kilometers, with elevations spanning over 60 meters. The highest points in the system are the northern and southern extents, with some additional intermediate high points. None of the three existing reservoirs is at a sufficient elevation to provide adequate pressure to all Gloucester residents.
Currently, seven booster pumps are required to provide adequate water pressure. Without the pumps, most residents would have reduced water pressure, and some residents would have no water at all.
Water pressure provided by booster pumps is not as reliable as pressure provided by a reservoir at sufficient elevation.
According to the Water Services Association of Australia
(WSAA) Water Supply Code, booster pumps should only be used to boost pressure and should not be the only means of supplying water to the required service levels.
The existing water system also contains nearly 30 kilometers of asbestos cement pipe that was installed between the 1930s and 1980s. The pipe is currently being replaced, but this project will take many years. Because of the poor condition of much of the pipe, pressures within the system must be maintained at relatively low levels (compared to the usual maximum desirable pressure), adding another constraint to the solution design.
Hydraulic Model Construction Made Easier
MidCoast Water used the asset information contained in its database to develop a hydraulic model using WaterGEMS’ ModelBuilder function. The water network asset information obtained upon handover of the Gloucester Water system to MidCoast Water was patchy, with some missing and incorrect data, including elevations, pipe materials, and diameters. Missing elevations were addressed using WaterGEMS’ TRex feature for terrain elevation extraction, together with half- meter contours obtained by aerial laser survey.
Tracey Hamer, planning engineer at MidCoast Water explained: “This provided a sound basis for developing a working hydraulic model. WaterGEMS, and its powerful database, was used to create, analyze, and compare various scenarios, including future demand and fire-flow scenarios.”
Optioneering for Optimal Decisions
To determine the best solution, MidCoast Water used WaterGEMS to develop over 100 what-if scenarios – assessing various combinations of reservoir heights, pressure reducing valve locations, and water demands. With WaterGEMS, MidCoast Water could compare the energy use of various options, including doing nothing – even though this was not a viable option. WaterGEMS also analyzed various options with large water reservoirs at varying elevations and varying numbers of pressure reducing valves (PRVs) placed within the system. The options with a higher reservoir
26 drain TRADER | September 2015 |
www.draintraderltd.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88
