search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
COMMUNICATIONS


Rules of engagement


A clear, coherent communications strategy is a key element of successful business travel policy


By BETTY LOW W Corporate travel communication is


HILE THE LEADERS OF THE ‘REMAIN’ CAMPAIGN spend the summer reflecting on how a coherent com- munications strategy


might have delivered a different result, the rest of us would do well to take heed of the importance of a relevant travel communications strategy.


And that strategy can only be formu- lated once the objectives are clear. Com- munications programmes need to reflect company cultures and support corporate objectives. But some trends are more than just com-


pany-specific. One of the most surprising discoveries in researching this piece was that a shift is taking place in the market. Some travel programmes (see p62 and p64) are moving from straightforward traveller communications to a plan for traveller engagement. Communication is not just about imparting information but can be a potent tool for pulling people together.


54 BBT September/October 2016


about more than distributing a policy and ensuring that travellers know what to do in case of an incident. There’s the need to consider who – be it travellers, suppliers or internal stakeholders – each communica- tion is with.


In addition, various content by its nature


will have a different shelf life and be distrib- uted by different means. There is also the small matter of two-way communication. Communication is not only about sending information outwards. It’s also about creating an atmosphere and structure that makes people feel involved and encour- ages them to communicate back.


IDENTIFYING OUTCOMES Trevor Elswood is chief commercial officer at Capita Travel and Events. He believes the key to successful communication is to “understand the outcome you want”. Many companies have the same objectives – lower costs and higher traveller service and safety, to be achieved by following company travel


policy – but the methodology to achieve this can vary hugely. According to Elswood, “there is a new breed of procurement person who is more holistic and understands how travel enables an organisation. “Most organisations want best practice.


Travel management wants to work within a framework to bring an organisation value. Any communication that supports this is appropriate, but how do you do it?” Value for an organisation is beginning to be viewed in a much broader context than cost savings. Microsoft’s company culture, for example, has shifted significantly to one of employees taking more respon- sibility. Travel policy has been simplified and is less about a set of rules and more about guidelines. It also means that in- formation is not just sent outwards but positive steps have been taken to ensure travellers are genuinely engaged with the travel programme and that traveller well-being is addressed as much as the fare.


BUYINGBUSINESSTRAVEL.COM


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132