This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
NEWS


GROWTH OF REGISTER SEEN AS POSITIVE STEP FOR CLEANING INDUSTRY


“The fact that it’s growing so rapidly shows more and more reputable cleaning businesses are acknowledging the need not only to increase standards but to be seen to be doing so by their customers.”


As a member of the National Pest Advisory Panel and the British Pest Control Association Servicing Committee, Mr Lodge is involved in formulating best practices and procedures within the industry and ensuring they are adhered to by BPCA members.


He believes the development of the register, to which more than 3,700 technicians are now signed up, can deliver an added bonus to the cleaning industry.


He added: “PROMPT raises the bar for pest controllers, so it’s great to see it moving in the right direction.


The growth of an initiative promoting quality standards in pest control has been hailed as good news for the cleaning industry.


Membership of the BASIS PROMPT register, which acts as a demonstration of professional credentials, has risen by 15% in just two years.


And an industry expert says such increasing appetite for legitimate companies to distance themselves from unqualified traders has positive implications for cleaning professionals.


David Lodge, a partner at nationwide firm Beaver Pest Control, said: “Pest control is a complicated and highly specialised subject and technicians who are not properly trained, use incorrect products or do not comply with regulations can land businesses in hot water.


“Membership of PROMPT provides independent proof of expertise, so it’s a vital vehicle in the ongoing fight against the cowboys that can blight our industry.


16 | Tomorrow’s Cleaning


“The more reputable companies that join the register the better for everyone because it increases competition for business and that ensures the cost of a professional, effective and fully compliant job will remain as competitive as it can be.”


Millions of pounds are wasted every year on failed pest control treatments and businesses can even be prosecuted if they’re proven to have been negligent in their choice of contractor.


Stephen Jacob, Chief Executive of BASIS PROMPT, believes it’s therefore vital to ensure work is carried out responsibly by people who are properly trained and competent.


He said: “Every member of the register will be a reputable, fully qualified technician who is up to date with the latest products and techniques.


“Our ID card is a symbol of quality which delivers the ability to recognise experts at a glance – it should be the first thing that cleaning businesses look for when choosing a pest control contractor.”


Emprise Services plc has been awarded a place on two separate framework agreements.


Emprise will provide a ‘one-stop shop’ to London Universities Purchasing Consortium (LUPC) members for cleaning and associated support services, including high-level cleaning and window cleaning, pest control, washroom services, porterage, waste management and hygiene services. The framework appointment is for three years, with a possible one-year extension.


The company will also be a supplier of cleaning and associated services to Eastern Shares Purchasing Organisation’s (ESPO) national Total Cleaning Services Solution framework (263), which has a one-year extension at the end of the initial three years.


Mark Beadle, Emprise’s Chief Executive, said: “Emprise has more than 20 years’ cleaning, pest control and waste management experience and being awarded a position on both the LUPC and ESPO frameworks is a reflection of the hard work of our team and our commitment to the growth of the business, as we continue to develop our long-term client partnerships.”


Emprise provides bespoke contract cleaning, pest control and security services for a wide range of facilities from universities and educational establishments, head offices and shopping centres to gyms, theatres, hotels and kitchens across the United Kingdom.


www.emprise.co.uk twitter.com/TomoCleaning


EMPRISE AWARDED PLACES ON TWO NEW FRAMEWORK AGREEMENTS


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80