search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
29


better than CFCs. Although HFCs were shown to not deplete the ozone, they still possessed signifi cant global warming potential (GWP).


More recently, manufacturers of ULT freezers have started to turn their attention to natural hydrocarbon refrigerants. Hydrocarbons have excellent thermodynamic properties and have proven to be very effi cient refrigerants with low GWP and zero ozone depletion capacity.


Moving heat around


The heat transfer mechanism of ULT freezers is another important consideration when assessing the overall effi ciency of the unit. Many ULT freezers employ a direct mechanism, whereby the liquid refrigerant is actively pushed into the evaporator. Direct cooling mechanisms operate by removing heat from the cabinet through expansion of the refrigerant in a series of tubes attached to the outside of the inner tank of the unit. This tubing system is what makes up the evaporator, and it is the evaporation following expansion of the liquid refrigerant that produces the cooling effect. The direct cooling method allows the refrigeration system to more effi ciently react to door openings and entering sample loads.


Indirect mechanisms on the other hand, require the addition of an intermediate heat transfer fl uid – known as the secondary refrigerant – that is cooled by the evaporator and pumped to the heat exchangers (much like a building’s air conditioning system in which cold water is distributed to the air coolers).


Meeting standards


The inherent value of samples contained within a ULT freezer makes it important for end-users to be certain that their freezers meet quality manufacturing and safety standards. Most modern freezers will typically carry a visual confi rmation of this in the form of distinct marks. The most well-known of these are the CE and UL markings.


The letters CE appear on a variety of products that are traded in the European Economic Area. The CE marking is self-declared, meaning the manufacturer has checked that these products meet EU safety, health or environmental requirements and comply with EU legislation.


A UL marking means that a representative of Underwriters Laboratory (UL) has tested the product and determined that it successfully meets the UL’s requirements. This mark verifi es whether a product is suitable for factory and fi eld installation.


In addition to markings, the industry is also taking into account a product’s sustainability and environmental impact. Rating systems such as Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) have been put in place to ensure designers make responsible and effi cient use of resources when constructing new laboratory workspaces or even entire buildings. In the US, federal agencies or


local governments reward or even require a LEED certifi cation for new buildings.


Good for the environment can be good for the wallet


The need to adopt sustainable technology is something more progressive manufacturers recognise. New ULT freezer models such as the Thermo Scientifi c TSX Series ULTs have substantially improved energy-consumption profi les. For example, the TSX600V ULT uses less than 0.015 kWh/day per box stored – up to 50% less than other conventional refrigerant-based freezers. Data from the UK demonstrates how switching to a more advanced freezer that employs a variable speed compressor, like a TSX600V ULT, can save as much as £4,413 whilst the TSX400V can save as much as £4,318 (approximately US$6,405 and $6,268 respectively) over a 10-year period.


Select manufacturers have even gone a step further by switching to more sustainable components, as well moving to reduced or even zero waste-to-landfi ll facilities that also support a greater amount of recycling. Implementation of zero waste programs have already helped a great number of companies by showing them how sustainable does not have to be expensive. Thermo Fisher Scientifi c’s site in Asheville, NC, for example, is zero-to-waste with 93% of materials being recycled and 7% waste to energy.


More than just sample storage


Modern ULT freezers need to go beyond simple reliability, and instead provide users with devices constructed in low environmental impact facilities, with modern, sustainable components and a fi nal product that has a low energy-consumption profi le. Technological advances to compressors and refrigerants help to afford peace of mind by ensuring samples remain safe and secure. While they may not seem like monumental changes, these critical adjustments are key to bringing sustainable practices to every aspect of the lab.


References


1. Calculated based on manufacturer published energy consumption data as of 2/26/2015 and energy cost assumption of 0.12 euros / kWh. Energy consumption is based on manufacturer published energy consumption data as of 2/26/2015. Data on fi le. Thermo Scientifi c TSU600V data with high-performance mode.


2. Calculated using data from the US Energy Information Administration Retail Sales of Electricity to Ultimate Customers published electricity and natural gas price statistics. http://www.eia.gov/electricity. Accessed October, 2015.


Interested in publishing a Technical Article?


Contact Gwyneth on +44 (0)1727 855574


or email: gwyneth@intlabmate.com Our articles are read by over 75,000 readers in print, online and via our Mobile App.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132