search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Chromatography 21


The temperature program starts at 130°C with a hold time of one minute. Afterwards, heating continues with a heating rate of 5°C / minute until reaching a temperature of 240°C which then stays constant for 10 minutes. The total time is 33 minutes.


Results and Discussion


The gas chromatographic method with Flame ionisation detection has been optimised for separation of almost all fatty acid derivatised FAMEs.


From 37 fatty acids contained in the standard mix, 36 fatty acids have been identified. Two fatty acids C18:1-cis and C18:1- trans could not be separated, as they co-elute. But this has no influence on the evaluation and differentiation between saturated and unsaturated fatty acids since both co-eluting fatty acids are unsaturated.


Figure 4 shows the chromatogram of a sausage sample with the identified FAMEs which have been generated according to the ISO procedure. Obviously, fatty acids C16:0 und C18:0 are mainly present.


In comparison to the results of the ISO procedure, Figure 5 shows the chromatogram of the same sample using the microwave procedure.


A comparison of the chromatograms (Figure 4 and Figure 5) shows a significant difference in the FAMEs. The results on C18: 1-cis+cis using the microwave procedure are significantly higher in comparison to the ISO procedure.


Table 1 shows that the results of the ISO method have a significant difference in comparison to the microwave method. For a more precise comparison, the peak areas of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids are used and displayed in Diagram 1, showing the difference of the fatty acid ratios between the ISO and the microwave method on sausage samples.


Comparison of both methods show that the result of unsaturated fatty acids with the microwave technique is ten times higher than the ISO method. These elevated results on unsaturated fatty acids could be observed in the same way during determination of other food samples such as milk powder, chocolate and potato chips, as displayed in Diagram 2.


In all of the food samples determined, use of the microwave procedure has generated a higher amount of unsaturated fatty acids. This confirms the hypothesis that the new microwave procedure prevents oxidation of unsaturated fatty acids during the process, and the more gentlegentler treatment results in higher findings when using the new microwave process.


The difference in the total fat concentration of food samples which varies from 19.66% to 37% results in the difference of unsaturated fatty acids as well. The amount of unsaturated fatty acids of potato chips is at the highest level initially when the product is fresh. As soon as the oxidation process has started (after opening the plastic bag) the amount of unsaturated acids is changing.


Diagram 2. Overview of samples determined by comparing ISO procedure with microwave procedure. Abbreviations: MP = Milk powder, ISO = ISO procedure, Micro = Microwave procedure.


Table 1. Identified FAMEs of 2 procedures in direct comparison. Positive findings are marked with X.


Diagram 1. Comparison of the fatty acid ratios between the ISO and microwave method, respectively, on sausage samples.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132