search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
28 February / March 2017 References


100 200 300 400 500 600


-0 -0


100 200 300 400 500


-0 -0 300 Nitrazepam 200 100 Conc 50 100150 200 250 300 350400 450500 -0 -0 Diazepam


1. Jufer-Phipps, R., B. Levine: Benzodiazepines. In: Principles of Forensic Toxicology, B. Levine (Eds). AACC Press, Washington, D.C. 237-270 (2013).


Conc 50 100150 200 250 300 350400 450500


2. Karithanom, M. Number of Deaths from Prescription Drugs, National Institute of Drug Abuse, National Overdose Deaths, CDC Wonder, (2015). https://www. drugabuse.gov/related-topics/trends- statistics/overdose-death-rates


Alprazolam


100 200 300 400


Conc 50 100150 200250 300 350 400 450 500 -0 -0 7-aminoclonazepam Conc 50 100 150200 250300 350400 450 500


Figure 4. Representative calibration curves of benzodiazepines. Nitrazepam and alprazolam were fit with a 1/x weighted line, while diazepam and 7-aminoclonazepam were best fit with a quadratic 1/x weighted curve.


results for a wide range of analytes in a single run. This approach significantly reduces analysis time when compared to immunoassays or single-analyte methods. Using a water-wettable SPE sorbent eliminates the common conditioning and equilibration steps associated with conventional methods without any loss in recovery or reproducibility. This property also enables the entire hydrolysis step to be


conducted within the wells of the µElution plate, eliminating time consuming and error-prone transfer steps, reducing the total number of post-incubation steps from nine to five. Combining this extraction procedure with the high efficiency separation capabilities of a solid-core UPLC column, results in a rapid, efficient and exceptionally accurate analytical method.


3. Laloup, M., M.d.M.R. Fernandez, G. De Boeck, M. Wood, V. Maes, N. Samyn: Validation of a Liquid Chromatography- Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for the Simultaneous Determination of 26 Benzodiazepines and Metabolites, Zolpidem and Zopiclone, in Blood, Urine, and Hair. Journal of Analytical Toxicology 29(7), 616-626 (2005).


4. Marin, S.J., R. Coles, M. Merrell, G.A. McMillin: Quantitation of Benzodiazepines in Urine, Serum, Plasma, and Meconium by LC-MS-MS. Journal of Analytical Toxicology 32(7), 491-498 (2008).


5. Marin, S.J., M. Roberts, M. Wood, G.A. McMillin: Sensitive UPLC–MS-MS Assay for 21 Benzodiazepine Drugs and Metabolites, Zolpidem and Zopiclone in Serum or Plasma. Journal of Analytical Toxicology 36(7), 472-476 (2012).


Table 4. Between-batch QC results. Values represent the mean accuracy and %CV of separate extraction batches. Mean values show the average accuracy for each compound and the average accuracy for all compounds at each QC level.


QC 1.5 Name


N-desmethyl zopiclone Zopiclone Zolpidem


7-aminoclonazepam Flurazepam


7-aminoflunitrazepam Chlordiazepoxide Midazolam


α-OH midazolam α-OH triazolam α-OH alprazolam Oxazepam Nitrazepam Lorazepam Clonazepam Alprazolam


Nordiazepam Flunitrazepam Temazepam Triazolam Diazepam Mean


100.4% 103.6% 99.3%


100.5% 103.7% 103.4% 101.5% 104.4% 100.4% 102.0% 100.3% 102.0% 107.0% 106.1% 101.8% 102.9% 104.4% 104.3% 102.1%


3.8% 3.2% 3.4% 1.9% 7.1% 2.3% 1.1% 4.4% 4.3% 8.4% 9.6% 4.3% 6.2% 6.9% 4.9% 8.7% 9.0% 8.1% 7.3% 8.4% 6.5%


QC 7.5


96.7% 96.7% 98.8% 95.6% 97.6% 93.7%


100.3% 104.2% 102.5% 98.8%


101.4% 98.5% 95.8%


100.2% 98.2% 94.6%


106.7% 98.2%


101.6% 102.4% 103.8% 99.3%


2.4% 3.4% 1.5% 1.0% 4.3% 2.3% 2.1% 5.4% 4.7% 4.9% 2.2% 4.1% 1.3% 4.2% 3.0% 4.7% 3.7% 2.8% 1.2% 2.3% 2.1%


96.6% 98.0% 95.8% 93.8% 99.3% 96.1% 99.3%


QC 75


102.1% 100.8% 98.3% 99.1% 98.2% 95.7%


100.8% 97.5% 95.0%


101.7% 96.3% 97.5% 99.9% 99.6% 98.2%


2.9% 2.8% 1.1% 2.4% 7.4% 4.7% 1.5% 3.1% 5.0% 4.9% 5.9% 4.7% 2.4% 5.4% 3.3% 4.6% 4.6% 2.6% 2.8% 3.2% 4.1%


QC 300


Mean %CV Mean %CV Mean %CV Mean %CV Mean 99.2% 97.7% 99.4%


97.1% 96.2% 91.7% 95.1% 97.6% 97.0% 98.4% 98.9% 99.1% 95.1% 97.7% 97.6% 98.1% 98.7% 95.2% 98.8% 95.4% 96.3% 94.7% 98.2% 94.9% 96.8%


4.7% 3.5% 1.6% 2.0% 5.0% 3.2% 3.2% 2.0% 2.5% 2.6% 2.4% 4.6% 1.8% 4.9% 4.5% 4.5% 5.2% 7.8% 1.8% 3.4% 7.6%


97.4% 97.2% 96.4% 96.2% 99.5% 96.5% 99.6%


102.2% 101.4% 98.4%


100.7% 98.7% 97.9%


100.0% 98.2% 98.9%


102.5% 98.1% 99.2%


101.2% 100.6%


Response


Response


Response


Response


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60