This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
insights Large scheme: Techpark, Bolzano, Italy


21


‘We want to give both the client and the community something that will be


respected’ Chris Lanksbury, Chapman Taylor





Adrian joined the company in 1986 and became a partner in 1996. He oversees the UK projects – typically complex, mixed- use, masterplan schemes. Adrian insists: “I consider myself both an architect and an urban designer and it’s my passion to blend both of those skills.” Looking at the UK scene, Adrian says: “Historically, we are


lucky to have had some clients who have been prepared to push the boundaries.” He sees the Princesshay project in Exeter – as a good example of a well-integrated mixed-use scheme that also demonstrates Chapman Taylor’s ability to collaborate with other architects. Chris arrived in 1979 and for the past 20 years been building


the international business, which includes eight wholly-owned companies across Europe. He is still involved in concept design, despite travelling widely, in a bid to spot growth possibilities. Chris says: “A key aspect of my job is to tie together the various offices – which are conceived and delivered in individual countries – into one Group business.” Surveying the international portfolio, he adds: “Every


country has its own culture and they are all very different. This brings a great variety to our work. We very much respect the environment of where we work in its context.” Typifying the work, Chris feels, is the Techpark in Balzano,


north Italy – a highly ecological project and part of an industrial heritage. In addition, he points to larger schemes in China, such as the Global100 Theme Park, and the Altstadtquartier development in Aachen, Germany. What do they think is Chapman Taylor’s distinct qualities?


“We don’t have a fixed architecture style,” explains Adrian. “It is part of Chapman Taylor culture to encourage our staff to work to the best of their skills. Ultimately, we are architects who work for commercial clients whose buildings have to work for them financially.” Chris adds: “We don’t go to projects with preconceptions.


We work with the client to create the buildings. In Britain, we have had a leading edge on urban regeneration and how to create an integrated mix of uses. We believe it has improved


(L-R) Adrian Griffiths and Chris Lanksbury


our city centres. We want to give the client and the community something that will be valued. We want to be respected by the client for the product we produce right across the board. I would say that this is like a traditional architectural role in a modern world.”





In terms of the challenges today, Adrian highlights two things. “Firstly, projects are so much bigger today. When you are doing a huge masterplan in one go, getting some natural variety into it is very important. Secondly, on the economic front, there has been a slight stagnation in the market, which has not fully recovered from the global recession in 2008, and this may continue. Being competitive in such a market is challenging.” However, Chris strikes a positive note in the end. “Although


we are not masters of the economic framework, architects have always worked in a fluctuating business environment. I am generally positive, particularly as we are now seeing more quality in buildings from concept through to construction.” It seems that, like the Scotland Yard triangle, Chapman


Taylor will continue to revolve on the world stage for many years to come.


  


• Company founded in 1959


• 450 staff in 90 countries


• 19 regional centres • Operating on six continents


• Urban regenera- tion specialists


• ‘Designer of the Year’ at the Retail and Leisure Awards


www.architectsdatafile.co.uk


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84