This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
www.stnonline.com


STN survey of nation’s transportation directors reveals challenges economy presents the upcoming school year


By Stephane Babcock For too many school districts to count, the


2009-2010 school year starts on a shaky foot. No matter the specific reasons — although the economy is good enough for most — school budgets are looking grimmer by the day. With current budgets in place, but prone to change, and as schools are making drastic cost-cutting measures, transportation direc- tors are waiting to see what changes may lie ahead when preparing next year’s budget. Of the almost 500 respondents to STN’s


Back to School Survey, 54 percent said they saw no operational changes to their depart- ments this year despite the economy. Te remaining 34 percent of directors had seen routes cut, 20 percent said athletic and/ or field trips were eliminated and nearly 1 percent bid services to private contractors. Some districts reigned in costs by increasing walking distances, sharing their transpor- tation management with another district, freezing new bus purchases and pay raises, and, for some, implementing pay decreases or outright layoffs. “[Te] substitute drivers’ and substitute


mechanics’ pay were cut by 28 percent,” ex- plained Mark Cegelski from Mayfield City School District near Cleveland. “Tey are the only employees not covered by the union con- tract and [were] identified as a place for cuts.” But, when looking to next year, close to


three-fourths of the contributing directors were not yet forecasting any effect on next year’s budget. A little more than 15 percent projected losing some routes, while others — 14.3 percent — believed team and field trips would be on the chopping block. Tonya Martin from Cripple Creek Vic-


tor School District RE-1 in central Colorado voiced concern over the connection of school funding formulas to student attendance. “I have already cut [down] to the minimum


number of routes. In our rural district, if we cut transportation, many of our students wouldn’t make it to school at all. Many par- ents do not have cars,” said Martin. At Northside Independent School District


in San Antonio, Texas, Transportation Direc- tor Rafael Salazar, Jr. is dealing with more


What are some cost-cutting techniques that you have implemented?


Reduced routes Cut drivers


Changes to alternative fuel Employed use of routing software Cut/reduced driver hours Cut/reduced driver benefits


0 65.8 %


23.6 % 7.8 %


30.8 % 38.3 % 9.7 % 75 150 225 300


How have transportation services been affected for the upcoming school year?


Not at all Routes cut


All transportation services eliminated Services bid out to contractor for first time Team/field trips cut/eliminated


0 54.1 % 34.4 %


0.9 % 19.6 % 75 150 225 300


than just a 5 to 10 percent budget cut; his district is also seeing an increase of 2,000 students per year. “Tis year is going to be very interesting from the standpoint of the recession [now] being in full effect,” added Salazar.


Cutting Costs and Budgets Overall, a little more than 70 percent saw budget cuts this year. Of those re-


sponses, 34.3 percent fall somewhere under a 5 percent reduction with another 21 percent saying their budgets were cut by 5 to 10 percent. Meanwhile, 10 per- cent reported budget cuts in the 10 to 15 percent range. A smaller group — close to 6 percent — was dealing with the blows associated with slashing budgets by 20 percent or more. Rick McBride of Pinellas County Schools, west of Tampa, Fla., not only saw his department monies cut by more than one-fifth, he faces the


33


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68