This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Heads of complaint


Acting in a conflict situation Acting in area not competent


Acting without or not following instructions 2 Client not kept updated Delay


Duress Failure to advise client adequately


Failure to send client care letter/client care irregularities Financial irregularities


Holding out as solicitor/reserved activity


Holding out as legal executive/ failure to inform of status Improper use of membership


Improper/incorrect/inadequate advice or action taken Inaccurate information given Inadequate service


Inadequate or no costs information given to client Lost files or documents


Misleading client, parties, court or employer Misleading or inappropriate advertising Unauthorised disclosure


Unauthorised approaches to employer’s clients Unprofessional manner


Private or personal disputes Work or office related disputes Employment related


Breaches of legislation or other codes Forgery or theft


CILEx / IPS misconduct


2013 % 5 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 0


0 5 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0


10 5


40


2012 % 0


2.5 1 0


1.75 1 0 1


1.75 13 4 1


14 0 1


2.5 0


14 6 1 1 9 0 1 7


2.5 1


13


2011 % 0 1 1 1 5 1 1 0 1 8 1 -


27 9 1 2 0 5 -


0 1 6 0 6


1 3


19


2010 % 1 -


4 5 3 1 1 4 4 3 1 -


8 -


12 7 0 8 -


3 3 7 0 0


3 1


22


2009 % 1 -


4 6 4 1 7 6 7 6 1 -


22 -


4 6 4 7 -


0 0 0 0 4


1 1 4


2008 % 2 -


13 2 7 2 9 0 2 4 2 -


7 -


2 0 4 4 -


0 0 0 0 0


2 9


29


2007 % 1 -


14 11 7 0 5 6 4 0 1 -


13 -


5 5 1


11 -


0 0 0 4 3


4 1 4


2.1.5 Timescales


An analysis was undertaken of the time taken to consider complaints. The table below sets out the time taken to deal with allegations of misconduct, measured from receipt of the allegation at IPS to determination of the case by the Panel or under the delegated decision procedure (see 2.2).


IPS key performance indicators set a target of 80% of cases being referred to the Panel within 6 months and 100% within 9 months. The information below indicates that IPS has met its KPI target with regard to the 6 month time scale. This is the highest since 2007. IPS has narrowly missed its KPI target for cases being referred to the panel within 9 months. However, there has been a marked improvement overall in the time taken to progress cases from 2011 and 2012, with more cases now being referred to the Panel within 9 months.


Timescale Number of cases 2013


0 – 3 months 4 – 6 months 7 – 9 months


10 – 12 months


Over 12 months


12


(86%) 1


(93%) 1


(100%) 0


0


2012 9


(17%) 17


(48%) 25


(94%) 1


(96%) 2


(100%)


2011 7


(15%) 24


(67%) 13


(96%) 1


(98%) 1


(100%)


2010 19


(46%) 5


(58%) 9


(80%) 4


(90%) 4


(100%)


2009 4


(22%) 7


(61%) 3


(78%) 2


(89%) 2


(100%)


2008 9


(35%) 5


(54%) 3


(65%) 6


(89%) 3


(100%)


2007 7


(24%) 8


(52%) 10


(86%) 0


(86%) 4


(100%)


24


Professional standards for specialist lawyers


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38