This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Evaluating Obstetric


Malpractice Cases (Continued from page 15)


failure to diagnose also must be the proxi- mate cause of the injury.26


Thus, if a


timely diagnosis would have made no dif- ference in the outcome, the failure to recognize fetal distress and expedite the delivery may not be actionable. The evi- dence must show that there was a better-than-50-percent chance that the baby would have been born normal or would have survived.


The selection of clinical markers and


the weight given to each variable to de- termine the timing and/or etiology of irreversible brain damage may vary from expert to expert and from specialty to spe- cialty (i.e., obstetrician, pediatrician, neonatologist, pediatric neurologist, pla-


cental pathologist, or pediatric neuroradiologist). Nevertheless, every lawyer who agrees to evaluate a potential birth trauma case must be familiar with the clinical markers that can help to es- tablish the etiology and timing of the events that caused brain damage or death. Some of the clinical markers used to establish a causal relationship between asphyxia and brain damage include: neo- natal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, abnormal fetal heart rate patterns, low Apgar scores, abnormal newborn neuro- logical findings, abnormal blood gas studies, abnormal ultrasound, CT and/or MRI findings, seizures within 24 to 48 hours of birth, increased nucleated red blood cells in the placenta or newborn cir- culation, presence or absence of multi-organ damage at birth, presence or absence of infection and/or sepsis, abnor- mal placental gross or microscopic findings, presence or absence of meco- nium staining, and the need for and extent of resuscitation at birth.


26


Cooper v. Hartman, 31 Md. 259, 533 A.2d 1294 (1987).


The defense will always manage to lo- cate experts who will either testify that the


brain damage was not caused by asphyxia, or that the brain injury could not have been prevented by earlier delivery. An- ticipating and overcoming the causation defenses concerning the timing or etiol- ogy of the child’s irreversible brain damage is a critical component of the lawyers’ trial preparation.27


New concepts, studies,


and theories find their way into the lit- erature on a regular basis. Thus, one must routinely read medical journals and text- books, attend educational meetings, and locate other, more experienced, lawyers to clarify, refine, and expand the list of clini- cal markers that are capable of identifying the timing and etiology of brain injury. Finally, it is imperative that newcomers to the birth trauma litigation arena net- work with other lawyers who are familiar with the defense theories about the etiol- ogy and timing of irreversible brain injury.


27


See generally, Dov Apfel, Placental Pathol- ogy: Challenging the Causation Defenses, Trial Magazine, May, 2000.


16


Trial Reporter


Fall 2000





Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48