This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Feature 2 | AMPHIBIOUS/LOGISTICS VESSELS


LCAC’s fuel – but take over four times as long to complete. Te BMT fast landing craſt will straddle these rates, burning 315 US gallons an hour, using 525 US gallons to deliver the payload 40nm (but taking 40 minutes longer). The following tables compare broad


speed and estimated fuel consumption data from the US LCAC, a UK LCU Mk 10, the Tribow FLC and the US Amphibious Assault Vehicle (AAV), showing time taken to deliver combat loads to beaches at 30nm and 12nm. A common offload time of 5 minutes, and a reload time of 10 minutes, has been added to each assault wave interval period. Tere are some roles that are far better


BMT’s Caimen 90 is a shaped monohull with a ‘Tribow’ design; it has been tank tested to deliver a 90tonne load at 24knots, and 40knots when unloaded


a far more detrimental impact on a loaded LCAC’s operating speed. There are other associated penalties


with operating LCACs. High daily and routine maintenance rates reflect both the complexity and cost of a gas turbine against a diesel engine, and the vulnerability of some LCAC components such as the skirt. Te twin gas turbine


engines have a high fuel use rate, at approximately 1,000 US gallons per hour (with payload) to transit 40nm. Compare this to a UK LCU Mk 10,


which carries a similar payload. In the same hour it will consume approximately 70 US gallons – but will only travel 9-10nm. To deliver the same payload the same distance, the LCU will use less than a third of the


Table 1: Performance figures - 12nm to beach


Planning Speed (knots)


LCAC (H) 40


LCU Mk 10 10 FLC


AAV 12


Planning Speed (knots)


LCAC (H) 40


LCU Mk 10 10 FLC


AAV 40 12


24 out/40 return


24 out/40 return


1st wave on beach


18 mins 72 mins 30 mins


60 mins Table 2: Performance figures - 30nm to beach


1st wave on beach


45 mins


2nd wave on beach


3rd wave on beach


150 mins 255 mins


180 mins 555 mins 930 mins 75 mins


210 mins 345 mins 150 mins


Estimate of total fuel used (US Gallons)


4,250 1,085


1,1811 53


2nd wave on beach


69 mins


3rd wave on beach


120 mins


231 mins 390 mins 98 mins


166 mins


Estimate of total fuel used (US Gallons)


2,000 455 872


21


suited to the displacement landing craft than a hovercraft, exploiting its ability to operate for extended periods independently, or as part of a boat group temporarily detached from its parent platforms. Te ability to patrol, loiter, moor, anchor


and beach, all at distant range, allows the LCU to act as a floating command post/mother craft for boarding operations or riverine patrols, with smaller assault craſt using it as a refuelling, maintenance and accommodation base from which to operate for days or weeks. Such capabilities can be extended for disaster assistance and humanitarian relief roles, including logistical and medical support, the movement of plant and heavy equipment, a diving platform or ferry operations. Developments in hul lform


hydrodynamic design have now freed the landing craſt utility from its ‘floating skip’ reputation. Te step change increase in performance offers a surface connector that can meet the demands of increased operating range and de-risk this vital link of the amphibious chain. Tey provide a compelling alternative to heavy LCACs for those forces that cannot justify the resources necessary to operate this impressive capability. And for LCAC equipped navies, a fast landing craft’s heavy payload lift, reductions in dock footprint, fuel use and maintenance regime, matched with a capacity for wider amphibious roles, provides a complimentary capability to operate on similar terms alongside these larger surface connectors. WT


Warship Technology October 2014


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50