PEER-REVIEW | DERMATOLOGY | 4-week period. Follow-up visits were at 1 month and 3
months, respectively. A statistically significant decrease in mean acne counts from baseline was observed11
. Many
studies for the treatment of mild to moderate acne show the efficacy of blue light, or combination of both blue and red light12-13
.
Immunological mechanisms
Potassium titanyl phosphate laser In one study, 38 subjects were divided into two groups; one group was treated once weekly and the other twice weekly. One half of face was treated with 532 nm KTP and the other half was left untreated. They were evaluated at the beginning of the study, and then again 1 and 4 weeks after the last session with the Michaëlsson acne severity grading score (MASS). A significant improvement was seen in the second group who were treated twice weekly14
Microbiological factors
. The 532 nm KTP laser could penetrate and activate
porphyrins to target P. acnes. It targets sebaceous glands with non-specific collateral thermal injury. It is well tolerated, safe and effective, with positive results up to 4 weeks post-treatment14-15
.
Pulse dye laser The efficacy of pulse dye lasers (PDLs) was demonstrated in a randomised, controlled, single-blind, split-face clinical trial of 40 patients with facial acne. They received one or two non-purpuric PDL sessions to half of the face (fluence of 3 J/cm2
). Serial blinded clinical assessments
from baseline to 12 weeks between treated and untreated sides of the face showed no significant difference16
.
PDL 585 nm laser targets oxyhaemoglobin selectively and induces photo-thermolysis of the inflammatory dilated vessels. Porphyrins are activated to produce phototoxic effects by the delivery of coherent yellow light16
. In another study, 80
patients were randomly divided in a 1:2 ratio and received only clindamycin 1%-benzoyl peroxide 5% hydrating gel C/BPO alone or in combination with PDL treatment (wavelength 585 nm, pulse duration 0.35 ms, energy fluence 3 J/cm2
, spot
size 7 mm), and were evaluated at baseline and at 2 and 4 weeks after initial treatment. Findings did not support the benefit of PDL treatment in acne vulgaris17
Hypertrophic scars
depends on its local anti-inflammatory effects. A randomised pilot study comparing a non-ablative, fractional 1550 nm laser versus a 595 nm PDL for facial erythema in 12 patients showed significant improvement results in both modalities for the treatment of acne erythema19
. Figure 1
PATHOGENESIS OF ACNE VULGARIS
Skin factors
Infrared lasers Low-level laser (light) therapy (LLLT) is a fast-growing technology in treating acne. During LLLT, adenosine triphosphate, nitric oxide release, electron transport, reactive oxygen species increase, blood flow, diverse signaling pathways, and stem cells are activated, allowing increased tissue repair and healing20
. Water is the
Hormonal factors
dominant chromosphere in the sebaceous gland, which is the target for infrared lasers. Selectively, it produces a dermal injury zone where sebaceous glands are located and therefore arrest the over production of sebum8
.
1450 nm diode laser The 1450 nm diode laser affects the pilosebaceous apparatus through peak thermal heating of the upper- to mid-dermis to a depth of 500 m and causes thermal coagulation21
. An infrared 1450 nm diode laser
accompanying a dynamic cooling device reduces sebaceous gland activity and inflammation of acne lesions safely and effectively with fluences as high as 14 J/ cm2
.22
baseline was sustained on 20 patients 12 months after the final laser session. Therefore, the 1450 nm diode laser could provide a long-term remission in acne and sebum production23
. In contrast, in a split-face trial on 38 participants, one
side of the face was randomly selected while the other side served as a within-patient control. A Candela 1450 nm Smoothbeam laser (Wayland, MA) was used with a double-pass technique, 6 mm spot size, 210 ms pulse duration and fluence of 8 or 9 J/cm2
. Three
POST-ACNE SCARS
Scars involving excess tissue
Keloids Bridge
Papular scars
Figure 2
CLASSIFICATION OF POST-ACNE SCARS
. Also, Seaton et al18 suggest that PDL
does not have an effect on P. acnes colonisation or sebum production. However, they revealed that the potent stimulator of neocollagenesis and a potent inhibitor of inflammation is the upregulation of transforming growth factor- (TGF-). So, its efficacy
26 July/August 2014 |
prime-journal.com
treatments were performed 1 month apart. On average, within participants, the lesion count and acne grade reduced on both sides of the face by the same amount. Also, both remained similar 12 months after the last treatment24
Atrophic scars
Deep dermal scarring
Superficial macular
Icepick scar
Rolling scar
Boxcar scar
.
1540 nm erbium glass laser In a study by Boineau D et al,
they point to the efficacy of the 1540 nm erbium glass laser in treating acne25
. In 2011, Isarría and colleagues
treated 20 patients with acne and scarring. Each one achieved good results with four sessions with a 1-month interval between sessions. Active acne improved in 85% of cases, and a very large improvement was witnessed in
A study showed 76.1% lesion reduction from
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56