This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Production • Processing • Handling


with conditional and operational factors to predict the ‘likelihood of failure’ (LOF) for each pipe branch. Visual inspection is a quick and


effective method for identifying potential areas for concern. Many pipework vibration problems are simply the result of operators not following recommended good practice, and visual inspection by skilled assessors can quickly flag up areas for improvement relating to pipe infrastructure. Tis may include installing more effective pipe supports or replacing worn or damaged supports, proper bracing of SBCs, avoiding fretting and poor geometry, and allowing for thermal expansion of tubing.


Te basic piping vibration


measurement phase identifies areas of concern based on measured values of pipework vibration. In this phase specialist engineers will first use a single axis accelerometer connected to a portable data collector to take initial vibration


comparison with assessment criteria in the Energy Institute guidelines. If vibration is assessed as being at a concern or problem level, or for pipework with a higher frequency vibration of more than 300 Hz, the next phase used by vibration engineers is based on specialist measurement techniques. Here, a variety of more in-depth tests can be deployed depending on need. In addition, engineers can implement specialist predictive techniques, applying sophisticated tools and modelling to provide a more detailed assessment of the dynamics of specific pipelines throughout their lifecycles. Te final stage of any pipework assessment is to recommend corrective actions to reduce vibration levels and the likelihood of future failures. Tese actions vary from improving the support infrastructure around pipework including bracing and dampening, or modifying the process conditions themselves to reduce fluid loadings.


Te design of practical and


appropriate corrective actions is important in achieving cost effective yet thorough solutions, and often utilises FEA techniques to predict the effect of remedial repairs, alongside CAD software for mechanical design of supports and bracing systems. Strain gauging and FEA


are powerful tools in this analysis process and although they are often perceived as being distinct and alternative assessment technologies, AVT has long recognised the power of combining practical strain gauge work with theoretical FEA. AVT’s Pipework Vibration


Fig. 2. Corrective actions to reduce vibration vary from improving the support infrastructure around pipework, including bracing and dampening, or modifying the process conditions themselves to reduce fluid loadings.


levels, ranging from 1 Hz up to 300 Hz. Tese measurements are presented as vibration amplitude versus frequency and enable the vibration to be classified as acceptable, concern or problem, based on


Solutions service offers everything from initial on-site surveys and vibration diagnosis, to solution recommendation, design and installation. AVT’s service helps customers


reduce the risk of major incidents caused by pipework vibration, as well as underpinning HSE responsibilities under the COMAH and Offshore Installations (Safety Case) Regulations 2005. l


Neil Parkinson is technical director at asset integrity specialist AV Technology (AVT). www.avtechnology.co.uk


www.engineerlive.com 75


“Proactive assessments can be used to routinely evaluate all pipework on a site, whether existing or planned, to ensure that best practice has been adopted and to identify possible areas of concern.”


Neil Parkinson, technical director, AV Technology


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100