This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
www.psam.uk.com SHOWCASE


SOUND SYSTEMS


set out to separate manufacturer from installer in the bid process. At the end of the bid process we got the best installer and the best equipment.”


ANZ’s management challenged the idea that a stadium couldn’t have ‘opening ceremony’ quality sound.


Davies. “That familiarity with the venue and the goals we had given ourselves allowed us to set a tough brief.”


Willsallen it seems was unperturbed. “The main confi ne of this brief was to use pre-existing rigging points and all cable infrastructure from the old PA system.” The thinking being, as Davies so succinctly puts it, “I’d rather invest our money in the new system hardware than the infrastructure. Our customers don’t value the infrastructure, they take it for granted, but what they experience directly: sound, vision and comfort, all have great importance.” Willsallen was engaged by the challenge immediately. “In one sense that brief was restrictive, but it did mean that the money we saved on cabling and rigging, which when you consider a large 80,000 seat stadium, is a signifi cant fi gure. So that part of the budget could be called on to buy a better loudspeaker system.”


ANZ Stadium expected nothing less than scrupulous and exhaustive competitive tendering; charging Willsallen with establishing such a procedure. His initial bid package invited 18 of the world’s leading pro audio manufacturers, “Representatives for all bidders were open for feedback, so we could comment on their initial proposals and they could respond to those comments. Besides a broad in-depth evaluation process of the proposal from a technical and qualitative perspective, I also took an integrated approach to the installation process. It is normal for installers to forge relationships with particular loudspeaker brands, Stadium and Arena managers all over the world will be familiar with this cosy scenario. But it doesn’t necessarily follow that the best installer for your project will have a relationship with the best manufacturer for your project. So I


Not that Willsallen’s tenacity in driving a deal on behalf of his client ended there, “I also included the maintenance contract within the installers bid. This precludes installers from making unrealistic loss leader pitches for the main project in the expectation that they will become the favoured bidder for the maintenance contract when it comes up and can make a profi t there. The benefi ts are twofold; rolling installation and the ongoing maintenance contracts into a single bid item precludes unrealistic and unsustainable bids: just imagine what happens to a bidder who secures the installation project on a wildly underpriced bid, and then fails to secure the maintenance contract? More positively, such an interleaved proposal means the successful bidder has a vested interest in doing a really fi rst class job on the installation to minimise long term costs to their own maintenance programme.”


Having reduced the original 18 contenders to a short list of three through his empirically moderated four-page criteria, Willsallen invited a shootout at the stadium. “For the shootout Scott and I and the stadium’s MD Daryl Kerry were in attendance,” says Davies. “We also invited many


115


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139