This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
COMMENT


Why supply chain maps could prevent the rail industry from having its own horsemeat scandal


Annette Gevaert, Director of Rail and Transport at Achilles, describes a worrying lack of knowledge among businesses about their supply chains – and what can be done about it.


R


ail companies should create maps of their supply chains to prevent an ‘industry


version’ of the horsemeat scandal. Research shows that 40% of businesses procuring only in the UK have no information about their suppliers’ suppliers. Despite this lack of information, 92% felt ‘confident’ in their ability to manage potential issues.


Achilles runs Link-up, the supplier registration and pre-qualification scheme for the industry. The company commissioned an independent survey of 130 procurement professionals working in a wide range of sectors – including rail and transport – to ascertain their key supply chain challenges.


Achilles runs Link-up, the supplier registration and pre-qualification scheme for the industry. The company commissioned an independent survey of 130 procurement professionals working in a wide range of sectors – including rail and transport – to ascertain their key supply chain challenges.


Results showed that:


• 40% of companies procuring only in the UK – including the rail and transport sector – had no information about their tier 2 suppliers • 18% of all companies – including those in the rail and transport sector – had no information about tier 2 suppliers


Annette Gevaert, Director of Rail and Transport


The situation is also reflected among SMEs. A third (30%) of companies with a turnover below £25m have no information on their suppliers’ suppliers, compared to only 13% of companies with a turnover of over £1bn.


Edward Funnell, rail policy spokesperson for the Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport, said: “This study should come as a


Achilles provides Supply Chain Management and Supply Chain Mapping services. This allows companies to maintain accurate data and ‘map’ their extended supply chains, to view supply information beyond tier 1 suppliers.


An automated ‘cascading invitation’ from


buyer to supplier to supplier’s supplier ad infinitum gathers comprehensive information about the supply chain, protecting buyers from global events and allowing best practice in the mitigation of risk.


* Research was conducted on behalf of Achilles by IFF Research in March 2013 amongst 131 directors, procurement managers and buyers of large UK businesses with over 250 employees.


Annette Gevaert


www.achilles.com FOR MORE INFORMATION


16 | rail technology magazine Aug/Sep 13


at Achilles, said: “Like most businesses, the rail sector is now dependent on increasingly complex and globalised supply chains.


“Rail is a safety critical industry, with people at its heart, and we must take proactive steps to address potential risks in supply chains before they affect people, planet and profit. The horsemeat scandal unfolded in a different sector but the same issues – caused by a lack of supplier visibility – could easily affect the rail industry.


“Our research suggests that businesses do not know who their tier 2 suppliers are and yet they remain ‘confident’ in their risk management processes – without the benefit of a complete picture of information. This suggests that procurement professionals are either unaware of the risk posed by tier 2 suppliers, or overly complacent in their existing systems. By creating maps of supply chains across all tiers the rail industry could gain visibility and traceability of potential risks and act as a role model to other sectors.”


wake-up call to rail companies and the Institute welcomes the fact that this research has been undertaken.


“While many companies take good care to ensure their suppliers comply with high standards of care to ensure that products are safe, how many are checking the levels of compliance with quality and safety standards of their suppliers’ suppliers?


“Many ‘tier 2’ suppliers may well be excellent providers, but as recent events have shown, when it comes to the manufacture of safety- critical products, companies who procure products from their suppliers need to ask questions of their suppliers’ suppliers too. Dented reputations, safety scares, unwanted media attention and additional financial and legal costs are much costlier than taking a little time to carry out checks on those who supply your suppliers.”


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92