This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
COMMENT


Investing in Britain’s future – hit or miss for rail infrastructure?


Mark Cowlard, head of rail at infrastructure consultancy EC Harris, discusses the impact of the Government’s spending policies on transport.


T


he Chancellor teased us with the ‘greatest investment in rail since the Victorian era’ during his June Spending Review. Hopes were dashed less than 24 hours later in Danny Alexander’s explanation speech, ‘Investing in Britain’s Future’, where we learned of continued support for projects already announced, rather than a plan for further accelerating economic growth through infrastructure delivery investment.


The positive news on Crossrail 2 has been welcomed by the rail industry, but the secured funding of £2m will only enable the production of an initial feasibility study. The Mayor of London will need to find funding for 50% of this programme. With a current initial estimate of £12bn, investors will need to be assured of the UK transport sector’s ability to deliver on time and to budget. The rail industry’s performance on programmes such as Crossrail, Thameslink and HS2 will need to become industry exemplars.


Championing HS2 – a hit for infrastructure


The debate around HS2 is set to intensify even further with the news that HS2 has the ‘green light’. Whilst providing long-term financial certainty, this has been achieved by a total funding envelope of £50.1bn including cost contingency, an increase of almost £10bn on previous estimates. This significant increase will put further strain on an investment case already under pressure with rising costs. The private sector must support the Government in getting early certainty of expected outturn cost.


We remain of the view that HS2 is needed Below: EC Harris headquarters reception


but the Government must get much better at explaining why to critics. The arguments for HS2 are largely capacity and ‘access to market’ driven, not about shaving off journey times. Government must get its messaging right or it risks losing the argument about the wider benefits of HS2. It also needs to consider an integrated transport strategy, connecting the whole of the UK, and connections beyond to the global market.


Above: EC Harris delivered operational readiness for the Javelin high-speed shuttle service that ran between St Pancras International, the Olympic Park and Kent during the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics.


Is electrification enough?


Other than confirming much of the detail from the last spending review, the ‘new’ announcements included £115m to electrify the Gospel Oak to Barking railway line, a study to examine electrifying the branch line from Oxenholme to Windermere, and an ‘in principle’ agreement to devolve part of the West Anglia rail franchise to the Mayor of London.


Electrification isn’t ‘game changing’ in terms of stimulating economic growth, and re-drawing the franchise map is also of questionable value. The West Anglia rail network is not just a railway for suburban London – it functions as a vital distribution corridor for journeys to and from much further afield, areas where the Mayor has no political locus. It is vital that the needs of London and the needs of the regions are balanced proportionately.


George Osborne announced a reduction in the resource budget for transport of 9%, a challenging number. Danny Alexander followed this by outlining a strategy that is entirely consistent with EC Harris’ recent contribution to Sir John Armitt’s infrastructure review.


In particular, ‘Investing in Britain’s Future’ said: “…the Government will introduce a new presumption that significant economic infrastructure projects and programmes should be undertaken by specialist delivery units with commercial expertise, reflecting private sector best practice.”


Furthermore; “Lord Deighton will now work with these departments to determine how this new delivery model should be implemented in practice on a case by case basis. This work will include: drawing on the Brown Review of the franchise programme and the work of Lord Deighton to improve delivery of significant infrastructure projects, the Department of Transport will bolster its commercial capability in rail franchising.”


Return to a Strategic Rail Authority?


It would seem that the Government is considering spinning off at least the franchising function of the Department for Transport into a separate delivery unit, staffed by commercially experienced and qualified personnel. Whilst the Government will no doubt reject any comparison with the former Strategic Rail Authority or OPRAF that preceded it, one can’t help but draw the obvious comparison. At EC Harris, we believe that franchising, along with many other commercially sensitive processes and projects, should not be managed by a central Government department that might not be equipped to make risk-based commercial judgements.


Therefore we welcome this direction of travel. We will offer our advice and support to the Government as it develops this important initiative.


Mark Cowlard


TELL US WHAT YOU THINK opinion@railtechnologymagazine.com


rail technology magazine Aug/Sep 13 | 15


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92