This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
PHILIPPINES


of a written notice of the seizure, and give them an opportunity to be heard in proceedings conducted by the Law Division of the BOC. In these proceedings, evidence including the presentation of witnesses can be submitted by the relevant division of the BOC, usually the IP Division, the IP holder who is allowed to intervene in the proceedings, and the claimant, importer or owner of the seized goods.


Depending on whether the seizure is contested, the proceedings can last from two to six months. During the proceedings, if the quantity of the seized fake goods needs to be specifically determined, eg, the shipment is mixed with non-infringing goods, or several brands are involved, a stripping of the subject container/s can be requested, the cost of which shall be borne by the IP holder. Te Law Division of the BOC issues its resolution within three to 12 months.


Disposition of forfeited goods


Once the Law Division issues its resolution forfeiting the seized goods, the IP rights holder can move for their destruction. Te Cargo and Disposal Division of the BOC takes charge of the matter, prepares a condemnation plan and orders the destruction of the goods. It takes about a year or so from the time the Law Division issues the resolution to the actual date of destruction because of administrative requirements. Most IP rights holders shoulder the cost of destruction, and are present during the destruction to ensure that the seized articles are actually destroyed.


Exercise of visitorial powers


Because the BOC does not conduct an inspection of all incoming shipments, the chance of counterfeit goods entering the Philippine market is still high. In addition to monitoring shipments at the port of entry, the BOC exercises its visitorial powers and conducts raids with the assistance of the police authorities. Tis visitorial power is provided in Section 2536 of the Tariff and Customs Code which states that the BOC “may demand evidence of payment


www.worldipreview.com World Intellectual Property Review e-Digest 2013 91


MOST IP RIGHTS HOLDERS SHOULDER THE COST OF DESTRUCTION, AND ARE PRESENT DURING THE DESTRUCTION TO ENSURE THAT THE SEIZED ARTICLES ARE ACTUALLY DESTROYED.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119