This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
US PATENTS • Affi rmed a California district court decision of infringement in Greenliant Systems v Xicor.


• Affi rmed a Connecticut district court decision of infringement in Whitserve v Computer Packages.


• Affi rmed a Delaware district court decision of invalidity in Magsil v Hitachi.


• Affi rmed an Indiana district court decision of validity in Alcon Research v Apotex.


• Affi rmed a Texas district court decision enhanced damages in Highmark v Allcare.


• Affi rmed a California district court non-infringement decision in Grober v Mako Products.


• Affi rmed a Missouri district court invalidity decision in Bancorp Services v Sun Life.


• Affi rmed a New York district court grant of sanctions in Rates Technology v Hicks.


• Affi rmed a Florida district court grant of sanctions in Orenshteyn v Citrix Systems.


• Affi rmed a Wyoming district court shop right decision in Preston v Marathon Oil.


• Affi rmed an ITC decision of non-infringement in GE v ITC.


• Affi rmed an Illinois district court decision of non-infringement in WM Wrigley v Cadbury.


• Affi rmed a New Jersey district court validity decision in Otsuka Pharma v Sandoz.


• Affi rmed a California district court non-infringement decision in Mintz v Dietz & Watson.


• Affirmed an Ohio district court infringement decision—In re Bill of Lading.


• Affi rmed a Georgia district court contempt decision in Merial v Cipla.


• Affi rmed a New Jersey district court validity decision in Otsuka Pharma v Sandoz.


www.worldipreview.com validity and


• Affi rmed a New Jersey district court summary judgment in Minkin v Gibbons.


• Affi rmed a Delaware district court invalidity decision—In re Cyclobenzaprine.


• Affi rmed a Texas district court dismissal in USPPS v Avery Dennison.


• Affi rmed a New York district court dismissal in Bayer Schering Pharma v Lupin.


• Affi rmed a Delaware district court non-infringement decision in Dey Pharma v Sunovion.


• Affi rmed an Arizona district court enhanced damages decision in Bard Peripheral Vascular v W.L. Gore.


• Affi rmed a Pennsylvania district court invalidity decision in Noah Systems v lntuit.


• Affi rmed a Delaware district court invalidity and non-infringement decision in Aventis Pharma v Hospira.


• Affi rmed a Maine district court non-infringement decision in Ergo Licensing v Carefusion 303.


• Affi rmed a New Hampshire district court infringement decision in Marine Polymer Technologies v Hemcon.


• Affi rmed a Delaware Astrazeneca v Apotex.


district court infringement decision in


• Affi rmed a Texas district court non-infringement decision in Mettler- Toledo v B-Teck Scales.


• Affi rmed an Ohio district court validity decision in Falana v Kent State.


Appellant losses • Reversed a California district court decision favourable to Osram, reversing an invalidity fi nding, in Osram Sylvania v American Induction Technologies.


• Reversed a Texas district court decision, denying rehearing in Highmark v Allcare Health Management Systems.


World Intellectual Property Review e-Digest 2013 113


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119