This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
COLOMBIA


NEW LEGAL


DEVELOPMENTS IN COLOMBIA


Luz Helena Adarve and Juanita Acosta Cárdenas & Cárdenas Abogados


Due to the fact that Colombia entered into free trade agreements with the US, the European Union and Korea, there have been several key IP developments in 2012.


Among these developments it is important to highlight the adoption of the Trademark Law Treaty and the Madrid Protocol, among others, which put our country as an active player in the IP global arena, and had a strong impact on the defi nition of government policies regarding the enforcement and protection of IP rights.


Among the local regulations recently implemented it is important to mention:


1. Resolution 21447/2012 aimed to simplify formalities and adopt the multiclass trademark application procedure. As a consequence of


this regulation, all documents, such as powers of attorney,


assignments, etc, with exception of withdrawals, will not need any notarisation, legalisation or apostille procedure.


2. Under the same Resolution 21447, a hearing stage during an opposition procedure was adopted, aiming to overcome the obstacles that prevents the registration of a trademark. T e hearing can take place at any time before a decision of fi rst instance is taken. T e purpose of this hearing is that the Colombian Patent and Trademark Offi ce (CPTO) proposes and endorses coexisting agreements between confl icting parties.


3. Under Law 1564 of 2012 (New General Code of Procedures), the Superintendency of Industry and Commerce, which is the entity in charge of


the administration of the patent and trademark


system in Colombia among other duties, was empowered to attend judicial disputes concerning: (i) IP infringement matters; (ii) violation of consumer rights; and (iii) unfair competition matters.


54 World Intellectual Property Review e-Digest 2013


T is expanded role of the CPTO will allow this entity to act and rule with the same qualities and prerogatives of a civil judge. T e main purpose of the extension of judicial powers to an administrative entity is to recognise that there is need for specialised judges to attend IP, related consumer rights and competition matters which nowadays are globalised issues.


4. Resolution 50720 dated August 8, 2012, which internally adopted the Madrid Protocol System. Currently the system is in full force. Between August 29, 2012 and February 28, 2013, a total of 690 foreign trademark applications using the system, entered Colombia from abroad. Among these foreign trademark applications, 28 applications have received oppositions. During the same period of time, Colombian companies have not used the system at all.


5. Resolution 57530 dated September 28, 2012 regulating geographical indications and appellations of origin.


6. Resolution 54093 dated September 18, 2012 adopting the patent prosecution highway by accepting foreign patentability tests.


7. Resolution 79462 dated December 21, 2012 establishing IP fees. In many cases such fees have been reduced.


8. In addition to the above mentioned new regulations the CPTO is working towards implementing a strong soſt ware infrastructure allowing the use of electronic means for trademark application fi lings and notifi cation of decisions.


9. Although the following new regulations are not exactly IP regulations, they are ‘neighbour’ laws recently adopted that we consider relevant and important to mention: Law 1581 dated October 17, 2012 regarding habeas data, and Law 1480/2011 which adopted a comprehensive consumer protection statute now in force since April 2012.


www.worldipreview.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119