This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
ITMA


way firms of trademark attorneys can operate. Te Alternative Business Structures (ABS), envisaged by the Legal Services Act 2007, have started to take shape. ITMA intends to ensure that firms operating primarily in the IP sector and who may wish to become an ABS, can be regulated by an IP specialist regulator. Tis is why ITMA and CIPA have jointly applied to become a licensing authority for ABS through their independent regulatory arm, the Intellectual Property Regulation Board (IPReg).


their rights. ITMA has been cooperating with the IPO and other organisations to collate evidence.


A Supreme Court decision in early 2013, involving Prudential and its tax advisers, underlined the importance of dealing with the right professionals. Te judgment confirmed that legal advice privilege applies only to lawyers— including, of course, trademark attorneys. Tis helpful clarification adds to the list of reasons why businesses should select professional advisers who are appropriately qualified and properly regulated.


LOCOG as heavy-handed, the organisers actually managed to protect the major sponsors’ investment in a measured and equitable way.


Te media’s heightened interest in trademarks during 2012 helped to raise understanding of the importance value of IP. High profile court cases involving well-known brands, such as Apple’s many disputes with Samsung and others, were widely reported. Te case that generated most headlines in the popular tabloid press was the one in which Apple claimed in a London court that the appearance of the Samsung Galaxy infringed its own registered design for the iPhone. Not so, found Judge Colin Birss. Samsung’s products, he said, ‘do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design. Tey are not as cool’.


THE 2012 LONDON OLYMPICS WERE A TRIUMPH. TO THE SURPRISE OF MANY, THEY ALSO SERVED TO PUT IP, AND TRADEMARKS IN PARTICULAR, FIRMLY IN THE MEDIA SPOTLIGHT.


Senior trademark attorneys—including many of ITMA’s officers—found themselves being quoted almost every time a leading brand found itself in a dispute over a trademark or registered design.


Cadbury’s dispute with its Swiss rival Nestlé over the use of the colour purple as a wrapper for chocolate made many more marketing people aware that colours, shapes, smells and sounds can be registered to distinguish one brand from another. Following the court decision, ITMA vice-president Kate O’Rourke published ‘six steps to protecting a colour as a trademark’ in a leading UK marketing magazine.


ITMA continues to support moves to make IP feature more prominently in the education system, from early years through to university. Tose who go on to start their own businesses should as a result be more aware of IP basics. Greater appreciation of the benefits of IP protection and enforcement will help reduce the problems that can arise when IP is not at the forefront. To assist those who are planning to start new businesses, ITMA continues to run free advice clinics for start-ups. Trademark attorneys also contribute to IP master classes that the IPO runs for business advisers.


One area of business activity that has attracted more government attention in recent years is that of unsolicited IP-related correspondence. ITMA members report that they come across dozens of examples each week of clients receiving official- looking notifications. Tey are not from the IPO, World IP Organization or the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market, but imply that trademarks are due for renewal or need to be registered and that recipients should pay a (usually very high) fee to ensure they do not lose


26


A higher media profile for IP and trademarks


Te 2012 London Olympics were a triumph of organisation, design flair and, above all, athletic achievement. To the surprise of many, they also served to put IP, and trademarks in particular, firmly in the media spotlight. Te special IP regime created by the London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Act in 2006 started to affect those who thought that a closer association with the Games would improve the desirability of


their products. Te media


were full of stories about bakers of Olympic iced buns, sellers of unofficial memorabilia, knitters of woolly dolls and even an ‘Olympic’ café owner who had all been cautioned by the London Organising Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games (LOCOG) that could be breaking the law.


Te Budweiser brand was the centre of attention twice during 2012: once when the Court of Appeal in London ruled that Czech brewer Budvar and American brewer Anheuser-Busch could both continue to own registrations of the Budweiser brand name in the UK; and later, when the brewer Anheuser-Busch asked Paramount Pictures to remove references to its Budweiser beer from the Denzel Washington movie Flight. ITMA’s other vice president Chris McLeod found himself explaining the significance of both events to the media.


they


ITMA issued a press release offering general guidance on how to stay within the law. Although some sections of


the media tried to portray World Intellectual Property Review e-Digest 2013


Te author’s explanation of trademarks was quoted in a weekly listings magazine in relation to ‘Jaguar’, where a gallery/bar in Shoreditch, London, applied to register ‘Jaguar Shoes’ and was opposed by the car company.


Court system: affordable justice for all?


In October 2012, the Patents County Court (PCC) introduced a new small claims track. Tis


www.worldipreview.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119