This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Eric Ostini


Applications Engineer GF AgieCharmilles www.gfac.com


QualityScan Wire EDM In-Process Gaging. What Took So Long? I


n-process gaging/probing is nothing new with conventional machine tools or even sinker type electrical discharge machines (EDMs). The capability is, however, very new for wire EDMs—mainly because while all the neces-


sary individual technological components were available, it took EDM OEMs years to figure out exactly how to integrate them into a wire machine. The capability to probe parts on wire EDMs allows shops to check and verify parts prior to and after the EDM process and without having to remove them from machines. But equally significant, recently developed systems make it possible for wire EDMs to also read the probe data and understand logic statements—meaning the machine can measure a table full of components after cutting and indicate which are within tolerance. Or it can return to those needing re-cutting and bring them into tolerance. And with the future incorporation of pneumatic chucks to hold probes, the whole process could be performed without operator intervention. What most people are unaware of is that wire EDMs have always been capable of in-process probing using the ‘electrical touch’ of their wires. However, with EDM wire probing, shops are limited to performing only a few measurement cycles such as center finds, edge finds and corner finds. The process is unable to indicate wall straightness or gage other part contours. These limitations were the driving force behind many EDM builders, GF AgieCharmilles included, working to incorporate actual probes into the wire EDM process. To successfully incorporate in-process gaging with an actual probe, EDM OEMs had to overcome two main hurdles. On the mechanical side, the challenge was how to mount a chuck for holding the probe onto the head of the EDM. On the control side, the probe had to be integrated with the machine’s CNC.


On some EDMs, heads are not designed to hold the extra weight, and mounting a chuck onto one side would create imbalance and affect the wire EDMing process. Fortunately, a few brands of wire EDMs, such as those from GF AgieCharmilles, feature heads that are robust enough to handle the chucks without machine performance being compromised. Also on the mechanical side, in-process probing requires that ma- chines have servo driven Z axes. To their advantage, most EDM builders, GF AgieCharmilles included, already have Z-axis servo-driven systems


14 ManufacturingEngineeringMedia.com | March 2013


developed for use on their sinker-style EDM machines and have an existing understanding of these Z-axis systems as well as using a probe with them. On the machine control side, in-process probing requires wire EDM CNCs have offsetting capabilities to compensate for the two different cen- terline locations of the probe and the machine’s head. Most machines in the industry have variables that allow them to accomplish such offsetting, so this wasn’t as significant a problem. But, the lack of specific cycles needed to have the machine measure key points on a part’s shape was. To solve this problem, GF AgieCharmilles uses macro B programming within the machine’s control. This type of programming commands the machine to move to desired positions and probe in the X, Y and Z axes, thus enabling key point measurements to be taken that were previously unrelated to the wire EDM process.


Machines then use data from probing to generate reports that use mathematical equations to verify that parts were in fact positioned cor- rectly in the machine prior to cutting. The reports also show that after the cutting, the part is to size or within tolerance according to key points indicated for measurement.


Recently developed systems make it possible for wire EDMs to read probe data and understand logic statements.


Also, macro B programming together with the use of logic statements make it possible for the machine to read if-then program statements. Such logic within the system not only tells users that parts are to size and ready to be removed, but also allows the machine to perform self corrections. This is probably the most significant accomplishment, and one that will impact lights-out production and continue to drive the demand for in- process gaging on wire EDMs.


With the incorporation of pneumatic chucks, robot toolchanging can be used to load and unload probes on wire EDM machines. And for standalone machines, the technology is moving toward having probes come down from a safe area above the machine worktable, measure parts, then move up and out of the work zone. ME


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240